Save to My Latticework unsave

Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner's Dilemma
save0 saved view8.7K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

One of the most popular models in game theory, the prisoner’s dilemma represents a compelling story with a range of takeaways. 

< ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Claudii libidini, qui tum erat summo ne imperio, dederetur. Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Vidit Homerus probari fabulam non posse, si cantiunculis tantus irretitus vir teneretur; Nec vero alia sunt quaerenda contra Carneadeam illam sententiam. Sed quid ages tandem, si utilitas ab amicitia, ut fit saepe, defecerit? Hinc ceteri particulas arripere conati suam quisque videro voluit afferre sententiam. Nunc vides, quid faciat. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc Hieronymus summum bonum esse dixit. Et non ex maxima parte de tota iudicabis? Huius ego nunc auctoritatem sequens idem faciam.

Tum Piso: Atqui, Cicero, inquit, ista studia, si ad imitandos summos viros spectant, ingeniosorum sunt; Utram tandem linguam nescio? Illi enim inter se dissentiunt. Etenim semper illud extra est, quod arte comprehenditur.

Bona autem corporis huic sunt, quod posterius posui, similiora. Morbo gravissimo affectus, exul, orbus, egens, torqueatur eculeo: quem hunc appellas, Zeno? Quid, de quo nulla dissensio est? Atque his de rebus et splendida est eorum et illustris oratio. Quam nemo umquam voluptatem appellavit, appellat; Aeque enim contingit omnibus fidibus, ut incontentae sint. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit.

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Identify win-wins.

Take time to consider the possible win-wins, even with potential competitors. What ar ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. Et nemo nimium beatus est; Graecum enim hunc versum nostis omnes-: Suavis laborum est praeteritorum memoria. Quae contraria sunt his, malane? An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cur post Tarentum ad Archytam? Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Sic, et quidem diligentius saepiusque ista loquemur inter nos agemusque communiter. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur.

Ita multo sanguine profuso in laetitia et in victoria est mortuus. In schola desinis. Laelius clamores sofòw ille so lebat Edere compellans gumias ex ordine nostros. Quare obscurentur etiam haec, quae secundum naturam esse dicimus, in vita beata;

Quae qui non vident, nihil umquam magnum ac cognitione dignum amaverunt. Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Quamquam in hac divisione rem ipsam prorsus probo, elegantiam desidero. Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore.

Explore More
Limitations

In real life, we mostly deal with repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas, where we can choose strategies to reward cooperation or punish betrayal over time. The incentives that individual decision-makers face are also altered by collective action such as rules, laws, and social punishment. 

We generally also have the opportunity to communicate within our versions of the prisoner’s dilemma, so we can negotiate and seek a level of confidence not possible in the story.

In Practice

Listen to this amazing podcast episode of golden balls.

Radiolab presents a truly gripping investigation into a game show based on the prisoner's dilemma. It really is fantastic storytelling and is highly recommended as a fascinating insight into this model.  

Global warming. 

If countries acted cooperatively, they would cut carbon emissions to help reduce global warming, possibly taking a hit to their economy as a result (let’s put renewable and green driven economies to one side for this example). However, if a country believes that another country will not take the action required then they might fear for the resulting economic advantage they will gain. The mistrust underlying a cooperative strategy, even when it's in everyone's interests, might lead to an individual strategy rather than a cooperative one.

Cigarette advertising.  

A common example cited in relation to the prisoner’s dilemma is the cigarette industry. When cigarette advertising was legalised in the US competing firms theoretically could benefit from not advertising and sharing the market. If one advertised, they would gain a dominant share, however, if both advertised they would split the market and have less profit because of advertising costs. It is of course more complex than that, particularly in terms of growing a market with advertising, but that challenge plays itself out in a range of contexts. 

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

The Prioner's Dillema is part of game theory, and provides an understanding of how we can work together, or not. 

Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the prisoner’s dilemma into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.

Connected models: 

  • Game theory: the prisoner’s dilemma is a model from game theory.
  • Mutually assured destruction: in terms of finding a shared, often counterintuitive, interest. 

Complementary models: 

  • Red Queen effect: in considering a potentially escalating competitive environment.
  • Divide and conquer: splitting the battle rather than fighting head on. 
  • Cialdini’s six principles of influence: to create greater connection and trust. 
  • BATNA: in the context of negotiated solutions. 
  • SCARF model: to understand when mistrust and threat dominate.
Origins & Resources

The Prisoner's Dilemma was originally posed by mathematicians Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher while working for Rand corporation in the 1950s. It was actually named sometime later by Princeton mathematician Albert Tucker.

The model gained a boost of profile when it was featured in Robert Axelrod’s book, The Evolution of Cooperation in 1994. Now in its fifth edition, the book is the foundation for the ‘tit for tat’ strategy outlined in this model’s summary during iterative prisoner’s dilemma scenarios. Though he did note it was dependent on a number of factors. You can read more about his research in this New York Times article.

Finally, if you want to experience the concepts in the Prisoner's Dilemma, it's worth investing about 30m into this free interactive and educational game

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.