0 saved
7.8K views
One of the most popular models in game theory, the prisoner’s dilemma represents a compelling story with a range of takeaways.
< ...Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Solum praeterea formosum, solum liberum, solum civem, stultost; Terram, mihi crede, ea lanx et maria deprimet. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Ad quorum et cognitionem et usum iam corroborati natura ipsa praeeunte deducimur. At cum de plurimis eadem dicit, tum certe de maximis. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Intrandum est igitur in rerum naturam et penitus quid ea postulet pervidendum; De ingenio eius in his disputationibus, non de moribus quaeritur.
Murenam te accusante defenderem. Quis est tam dissimile homini. Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Ipse Epicurus fortasse redderet, ut Sextus Peducaeus, Sex. Est autem etiam actio quaedam corporis, quae motus et status naturae congruentis tenet;
Hunc vos beatum; Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget. Et quidem Arcesilas tuus, etsi fuit in disserendo pertinacior, tamen noster fuit; Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; At quanta conantur! Mundum hunc omnem oppidum esse nostrum! Incendi igitur eos, qui audiunt, vides. Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Quis Pullum Numitorium Fregellanum, proditorem, quamquam rei publicae nostrae profuit, non odit? Est enim effectrix multarum et magnarum voluptatum. Experiamur igitur, inquit, etsi habet haec Stoicorum ratio difficilius quiddam et obscurius.
- Identify win-wins.
Take time to consider the possible win-wins, even with potential competitors. What ar ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliter enim explicari, quod quaeritur, non potest. Themistocles quidem, cum ei Simonides an quis alius artem memoriae polliceretur, Oblivionis, inquit, mallem. Quid censes in Latino fore?
Venit ad extremum; Quaerimus enim finem bonorum. Nihil ad rem! Ne sit sane; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Bonum valitudo: miser morbus. Hoc est dicere: Non reprehenderem asotos, si non essent asoti.
Haeret in salebra. Et hercule-fatendum est enim, quod sentio -mirabilis est apud illos contextus rerum. Occultum facinus esse potuerit, gaudebit; Non minor, inquit, voluptas percipitur ex vilissimis rebus quam ex pretiosissimis. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Gloriosa ostentatio in constituendo summo bono. Ut necesse sit omnium rerum, quae natura vigeant, similem esse finem, non eundem. Quis animo aequo videt eum, quem inpure ac flagitiose putet vivere? Bork Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim.
In real life, we mostly deal with repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas, where we can choose strategies to reward cooperation or punish betrayal over time. The incentives that individual decision-makers face are also altered by collective action such as rules, laws, and social punishment.
We generally also have the opportunity to communicate within our versions of the prisoner’s dilemma, so we can negotiate and seek a level of confidence not possible in the story.
Listen to this amazing podcast episode of golden balls.
Radiolab presents a truly gripping investigation into a game show based on the prisoner's dilemma. It really is fantastic storytelling and is highly recommended as a fascinating insight into this model.
Global warming.
If countries acted cooperatively, they would cut carbon emissions to help reduce global warming, possibly taking a hit to their economy as a result (let’s put renewable and green driven economies to one side for this example). However, if a country believes that another country will not take the action required then they might fear for the resulting economic advantage they will gain. The mistrust underlying a cooperative strategy, even when it's in everyone's interests, might lead to an individual strategy rather than a cooperative one.
Cigarette advertising.
A common example cited in relation to the prisoner’s dilemma is the cigarette industry. When cigarette advertising was legalised in the US competing firms theoretically could benefit from not advertising and sharing the market. If one advertised, they would gain a dominant share, however, if both advertised they would split the market and have less profit because of advertising costs. It is of course more complex than that, particularly in terms of growing a market with advertising, but that challenge plays itself out in a range of contexts.
The Prioner's Dillema is part of game theory, and provides an understanding of how we can work together, or not.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the prisoner’s dilemma into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Game theory: the prisoner’s dilemma is a model from game theory.
- Mutually assured destruction: in terms of finding a shared, often counterintuitive, interest.
Complementary models:
- Red Queen effect: in considering a potentially escalating competitive environment.
- Divide and conquer: splitting the battle rather than fighting head on.
- Cialdini’s six principles of influence: to create greater connection and trust.
- BATNA: in the context of negotiated solutions.
- SCARF model: to understand when mistrust and threat dominate.
The Prisoner's Dilemma was originally posed by mathematicians Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher while working for Rand corporation in the 1950s. It was actually named sometime later by Princeton mathematician Albert Tucker.
The model gained a boost of profile when it was featured in Robert Axelrod’s book, The Evolution of Cooperation in 1994. Now in its fifth edition, the book is the foundation for the ‘tit for tat’ strategy outlined in this model’s summary during iterative prisoner’s dilemma scenarios. Though he did note it was dependent on a number of factors. You can read more about his research in this New York Times article.
Finally, if you want to experience the concepts in the Prisoner's Dilemma, it's worth investing about 30m into this free interactive and educational game.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.