0 saved
13.8K views
Imagine playing a game of chess where your opponent places their queen directly in the kill zone of your pawn. You'd take it, right? If so, tha ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Utilitatis causa amicitia est quaesita. Atqui eorum nihil est eius generis, ut sit in fine atque extrerno bonorum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus. An est aliquid, quod te sua sponte delectet? Maximus dolor, inquit, brevis est.
Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Levatio igitur vitiorum magna fit in iis, qui habent ad virtutem progressionis aliquantum. Sed ad bona praeterita redeamus. Post enim Chrysippum eum non sane est disputatum. Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi. Eorum enim est haec querela, qui sibi cari sunt seseque diligunt. Nunc vero a primo quidem mirabiliter occulta natura est nec perspici nec cognosci potest.
Longum est enim ad omnia respondere, quae a te dicta sunt. Hic quoque suus est de summoque bono dissentiens dici vere Peripateticus non potest. Ergo opifex plus sibi proponet ad formarum quam civis excellens ad factorum pulchritudinem? Quod maxime efficit Theophrasti de beata vita liber, in quo multum admodum fortunae datur. Quid enim de amicitia statueris utilitatis causa expetenda vides.
- Stop and ask ‘and what would happen next?’
Rather than commit to an initial appealing decisi ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Eadem nunc mea adversum te oratio est. Etenim semper illud extra est, quod arte comprehenditur. Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Plane idem, inquit, et maxima quidem, qua fieri nulla maior potest. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Idemne potest esse dies saepius, qui semel fuit? Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
De ingenio eius in his disputationibus, non de moribus quaeritur. Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Cur haec eadem Democritus?
Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Certe non potest. Nummus in Croesi divitiis obscuratur, pars est tamen divitiarum. Portenta haec esse dicit, neque ea ratione ullo modo posse vivi; Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi.
Second-Order Thinking is effortful and can ultimately be wildly unreliable. Each step away from the initial direct causal relationship — between a decision and the immediate implication — creates new factors to consider, other players and agents, and general complexity. It is difficult to predict or consider all of these factors in any meaningful way.
Automation and the fourth industrial revolution.
One of the contradictions of capitalism that is still being played out in real time around us, is the impact of automation. There is still some debate about the impact of automation on jobs. While there is general agreement that we are losing many jobs, it’s unclear how many new jobs are being created through a ‘robot driven economy’.
A first order thinking approach to automation would say ‘we can save on labour costs and be more efficient by automating’. The second order and beyond thinking might raise questions about less people in the workforce and the implications on reducing consumer power — thus costing those businesses.
Again, this is still being played out with some debate about actual implications (second order thinking is often harder to predict), but has led to growing calls for things such as a universal basic income.
Asimov and the Foundation series.
I couldn’t resist putting this geeky reference in here. Science fiction writer Asimov coined the concept of psychohistory in the Foundation series. This is the (fictional) combination of history, sociology and maths to make predictions about large groups of people. The idea was that it was hard to predict the behaviour of individuals, but the behaviour of groups of people and civilisations was highly predictable through what could be seen as a type of second order thinking.
Chess.
Chess and other strategy games capture this well. It’s often tempting to take a piece in chess, when in reality it is a play by your opponent to draw you into a trap. The immediate gain of taking a piece leads to long term consequences of weakening your position and leading you to lose the game.
Second-Order Thinking is a simple and powerful mental model to prevent reactive decisions and consider long term implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave Second-Order Thinking into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: first-order thinking sits within fast thinking.
- The domino effect: using second order thinking to gain momentum.
- Opportunity cost: considering the cost of the next best option.
- Compounding: how an initial decision can have a compounded effect.
- Butterfly effect: how small decisions can make large impacts over time.
- 5 whys and fishbone diagram: to dig deeper beyond initial causes.
Complementary models:
- Feedback loops: generating regular feedback points to inform the accuracy of second order thinking.
- Agile methodology: providing an iterative process to test and learn from.
- Probability thinking: to consider the likelihood of various potential outcomes.
- High velocity decisions: particularly considering whether something is reversible.
- First principles and ockham's razor: to cut down the assumptions built up over second order thinking.
- 5 whys: to consider a retrospective view of cause in contrast to the future-focused nature of second order thinking.
The Second-Order Thinking mental model has been developed by Howard Marks, the co-chairman of Oaktree investments, who presented it as second-level thinking in his book The Most Important Thing. As he explained: “First-level thinkers look for simple formulas and easy answers. Second-level thinkers know that success in investing is the antithesis of simple.”
My Notes
-
1546 days ago arun , CoFounder ModelThinkers & keynote speakerI love this. I'm trying to embed the actionable takeaway of asking 'and what would happen next' for any significant decisions.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.