0 saved
10.1K views
A popular model in risk management across domains as diverse as aerospace, healthcare, mining, and manufacturing, the Swiss Cheese Mo ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quod, inquit, quamquam voluptatibus quibusdam est saepe iucundius, tamen expetitur propter voluptatem. Vitiosum est enim in dividendo partem in genere numerare. Et adhuc quidem ita nobis progresso ratio est, ut ea duceretur omnis a prima commendatione naturae. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quid enim ab antiquis ex eo genere, quod ad disserendum valet, praetermissum est? Non ego tecum iam ita iocabor, ut isdem his de rebus, cum L. Si de re disceptari oportet, nulla mihi tecum, Cato, potest esse dissensio. Que Manilium, ab iisque M. Non quaeritur autem quid naturae tuae consentaneum sit, sed quid disciplinae. Apud imperitos tum illa dicta sunt, aliquid etiam coronae datum; Quid, de quo nulla dissensio est? Nos commodius agimus. Sed potestne rerum maior esse dissensio? Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Sed finge non solum callidum eum, qui aliquid improbe faciat, verum etiam praepotentem, ut M. Eaedem enim utilitates poterunt eas labefactare atque pervertere. Praeterea sublata cognitione et scientia tollitur omnis ratio et vitae degendae et rerum gerendarum. Bonum negas esse divitias, praeposìtum esse dicis? Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. Quid est, quod ab ea absolvi et perfici debeat? Non est igitur voluptas bonum. Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Laelius clamores sofòw ille so lebat Edere compellans gumias ex ordine nostros. Quid dubitas igitur mutare principia naturae?
- Assume that human error will occur.
Reason’s work was premised on the id ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Tu enim ista lenius, hic Stoicorum more nos vexat. Causa autem fuit huc veniendi ut quosdam hinc libros promerem. Bona autem corporis huic sunt, quod posterius posui, similiora.
Sit enim idem caecus, debilis. Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Honesta oratio, Socratica, Platonis etiam. Nec mihi illud dixeris: Haec enim ipsa mihi sunt voluptati, et erant illa Torquatis. Si longus, levis. In qua quid est boni praeter summam voluptatem, et eam sempiternam?
Iubet igitur nos Pythius Apollo noscere nosmet ipsos. Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus. Ea possunt paria non esse. Illa videamus, quae a te de amicitia dicta sunt. Quid igitur dubitamus in tota eius natura quaerere quid sit effectum? Conferam tecum, quam cuique verso rem subicias; Nec vero sum nescius esse utilitatem in historia, non modo voluptatem. Itaque vides, quo modo loquantur, nova verba fingunt, deserunt usitata. Cur deinde Metrodori liberos commendas? De vacuitate doloris eadem sententia erit.
The metaphor of Swiss Cheese has clearly resonated in safety and accident domains, though criticism has persisted. One of the prime criticisms is the simplistic nature of the metaphor that leaves it too generic and without value. Many point to the fact that Reason himself tried to expand his work with subsequent diagrams and papers which have not persisted like the Swiss Cheese Model. At worst, it's seen as a reductionist approach that was born from his period working as a consultant, at best it's seen as a tool he used to communicate important concepts, albeit relatively superficially, to management.
For example, some would argue the metaphor presents accidents as a linear occurrence, while in reality, they occur in dynamic and non-linear ways. This links to a broader criticism that it lacks a systems and dynamic view of problems, implying that each component, like a slice of cheese, can be altered and even fixed in isolation.
Another issue with the original diagram is how it continues to be interpreted so differently by practitioners. While some would argue that its broad definition allows for diverse agreement and application, others point to studies of practitioners who were revealed to have different understandings of what the model represents and what it means as a result.
Covid.
Below is Australian Virologist Ian Mackay’s repurposed version of the Swiss Cheese Model as it was applied to Covid mitigation.
Risk consultant Julian Talbot used this model to explain the devastation of the 2009 Australian bushfires in the diagram below.
Engineering.
Michigan Tech used this diagram to explore the safety elements in engineering, including a mitigation layer on the end.
d
According to James Reason, his inspiration for this model came in the 1970s while he was making tea. He was distracted by his large insistent cat and absent-mindedly dolloped a large spoonful of cat food into the teapot. Reason was fascinated by the similarities of the tasks that led to his mistake and this deepened his research that culminated into his book A Life in Errors - From Little Slips to Big Disasters. He particularly was interested in the impact of mistakes with human-machine interaction, particularly in the high-stakes fields such as aerospace to nuclear power.
Others have noted that Reason had input from John Wreathall in developing what was essentially a building on traditional safety management thinking with an understanding of human error. Reason published the original work behind this model in 1990, then explored it more explicitly in the British medical journal in 2000, though it was several years before it was developed as the organisational accident model, and later known as the Swiss Cheese Model.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.