They can’t have it all right? So the next time you’re sorting through a long, long list of requirements with a group of stakeholders, c ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Quid enim de amicitia statueris utilitatis causa expetenda vides. Item de contrariis, a quibus ad genera formasque generum venerunt. Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Sed nonne merninisti licere mihi ista probare, quae sunt a te dicta?
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Illi enim inter se dissentiunt. Conferam tecum, quam cuique verso rem subicias; Ita similis erit ei finis boni, atque antea fuerat, neque idem tamen; Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. -delector enim, quamquam te non possum, ut ais, corrumpere, delector, inquam, et familia vestra et nomine. Ita ceterorum sententiis semotis relinquitur non mihi cum Torquato, sed virtuti cum voluptate certatio. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Restant Stoici, qui cum a Peripateticis et Academicis omnia transtulissent, nominibus aliis easdem res secuti sunt. Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere?
Quos quidem tibi studiose et diligenter tractandos magnopere censeo. Itaque a sapientia praecipitur se ipsam, si usus sit, sapiens ut relinquat. Ergo hoc quidem apparet, nos ad agendum esse natos. Ne amores quidem sanctos a sapiente alienos esse arbitrantur. Sit ista in Graecorum levitate perversitas, qui maledictis insectantur eos, a quibus de veritate dissentiunt. Aliena dixit in physicis nec ea ipsa, quae tibi probarentur; Quorum sine causa fieri nihil putandum est.
- Identify goals and participants.
Understanding the nature of the project, including key purpose, a ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Miserum hominem! Si dolor summum malum est, dici aliter non potest. Etsi ea quidem, quae adhuc dixisti, quamvis ad aetatem recte isto modo dicerentur. Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Bork Conclusum est enim contra Cyrenaicos satis acute, nihil ad Epicurum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem; Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt.
Sed ut iis bonis erigimur, quae expectamus, sic laetamur iis, quae recordamur. Sed quid minus probandum quam esse aliquem beatum nec satis beatum? Propter nos enim illam, non propter eam nosmet ipsos diligimus. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Si quae forte-possumus. Eorum enim est haec querela, qui sibi cari sunt seseque diligunt.
Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. Tu autem, si tibi illa probabantur, cur non propriis verbis ea tenebas? Cur ipse Pythagoras et Aegyptum lustravit et Persarum magos adiit? Atque ab isto capite fluere necesse est omnem rationem bonorum et malorum. Potius ergo illa dicantur: turpe esse, viri non esse debilitari dolore, frangi, succumbere.
The MoSCoW Method is highly subjective, not providing clear criteria for the various categories, nor providing distinctions within a category. For example, if ten requirements are identified as ‘must-haves’, there is no further prioritisation of them within the method.
Life sciences platform.
This case study from Browser, a user-centred consulting firm, describes how they helped their client to establish a life science platform using the MoSCoW Method.
The MoSCoW method is a product feature prioritisation technique that takes a slightly different approach to alternative such as RICE scores, impact effort matrix or the kano model.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the MoSCoW method into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- RICE score, impact effort matrix and Kano method: as alternatives ways of prioritising.
- Pareto principle: in establishing how to identify the 20 that delivers the 80.
- Eisenhower matrix: which is a more individually targeted approach based on similar concepts.
Complementary models:
- Agile methodology: an iterative approach that works well with this form of prioritisation.
- Empathy map: to consider the potential impact on a specific audience group.
- Zawinski’s law: a warning to prioritise and avoid product bloat.
- Lean thinking: considering how to deliver real value with fewer resources, and potentially features.
- Minimum viable product: to test core basic ‘must have’ features from a customer perspective.
- Golden circle: to identify the core purpose of your business to guide product feature decisions.
- First principles: understanding the core offer of a product and need of a customer.
The MoSCoW Method was developed by Dai Clegg who, with a rich history of big data and data modelling for a range of large corporates, now works for Evidence for Development — an NGO dedicated to reducing poverty with evidence-based decisions.
Clegg originally developed the method for prioritisation in timeboxed projects during his time with Oracle and it was later donated to the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM).
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”