When applied broadly, an understanding of Entropy and The Second Law of Thermodynamics helps explain the passa ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae sequuntur igitur? Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? Inquit, dasne adolescenti veniam? Immo videri fortasse. Non enim solum Torquatus dixit quid sentiret, sed etiam cur. At Zeno eum non beatum modo, sed etiam divitem dicere ausus est. Varietates autem iniurasque fortunae facile veteres philosophorum praeceptis instituta vita superabat.
Scaevolam M. Putabam equidem satis, inquit, me dixisse. Facile est hoc cernere in primis puerorum aetatulis. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias? Suo genere perveniant ad extremum; Odium autem et invidiam facile vitabis. Et hunc idem dico, inquieta sed ad virtutes et ad vitia nihil interesse.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Et nemo nimium beatus est; An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Restatis igitur vos; Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Et quidem iure fortasse, sed tamen non gravissimum est testimonium multitudinis. Hic, qui utrumque probat, ambobus debuit uti, sicut facit re, neque tamen dividit verbis. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur.
- View everything as organised energy, that is decaying and dispersing.
Viewing ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? Tollitur beneficium, tollitur gratia, quae sunt vincla concordiae. Certe non potest. Atqui iste locus est, Piso, tibi etiam atque etiam confirmandus, inquam; Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis.
Ex rebus enim timiditas, non ex vocabulis nascitur. Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis. Itaque haec cum illis est dissensio, cum Peripateticis nulla sane. Portenta haec esse dicit, neque ea ratione ullo modo posse vivi;
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sunt enim quasi prima elementa naturae, quibus ubertas orationis adhiberi vix potest, nec equidem eam cogito consectari. Quae quo sunt excelsiores, eo dant clariora indicia naturae. Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Qualem igitur hominem natura inchoavit? Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. Aut unde est hoc contritum vetustate proverbium: quicum in tenebris?
From a scientific point of view, there are some supposed challenges to The Second Law from quantum physics — but to be honest, we still don’t understand those challenges and the associated ongoing debate, which you can explore more in this 2017 Scientific American article.
In truth, we find a more interesting exploration of limitations via how you might use these models as a guide in your broader work and life. From that perspective, you might consider how the application of this model assumes that things decay, rather than change. That is, when applied to businesses, products, or relationships, rather than assuming decay, it might be more useful to assume change — that those elements will continue to evolve and shift which might or might not result in greater disorder. Though the pull towards disorder is still a compelling explanation for countless situations.
The steam engine.
It’s no coincidence that The Laws of Thermodynamics arose during the Industrial Revolution and the birth of the steam engine. The steam engine, at a basic level, has three components — a hot energy source (steam); a device that converts that heat energy into movement (pistons); and a vent that extracts energy that hasn’t been used as heat (a cold sink).
The need for the cold sink demonstrated that when heat was converted to movement, some of the heat was transferred into the system’s surroundings. This was an indicator that for energy to move from a high-temperature body to a low body one that work, or additional energy, was required.
The ice swan.
Imagine an ice sculpture of a swan sitting in an ocean. The sculpture might have incredible detail and artistry, meanwhile, the water around it has undefinable depths. Which do you think has more Entropy?
If you answered with the ocean, you’d be right. The ice sculpture is an ordered and defined object in comparison to the dispersed, random, and dare we say ‘disordered’ state of the water molecules in the ocean. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that, without intervention, there is a greater probability that water molecules will organise themselves in the form of an ocean than that of an ice sculpted swan as a result.
Your bedroom.
A common analogy to explain Entropy is that of your messy bedroom. There are more ways your bedroom can be messy, than ways it could be clean and ordered. In that sense, your messy bedroom has high Entropy, and the Second Law would imply that it will tend towards that state if left unchecked.
,
As described in the In Practice section, the field of Thermodynamics was born from the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the steam engine. As with all such ideas, there were many contributors to the field, but French physicist Sadi Carnot was certainly seen as one of the leading thinkers in the space. His discussion of ‘thermodynamic efficiency’ was far ahead of its time.
Rudolf Clausius, working independently in the early 1850s, posited similar ideas after examining how heat from a heated body would flow to one of a lower temperature. He laid the groundwork for the Second Law by explaining: “heat does not pass from a body at low temperature to one at high temperature without an accompanying change elsewhere.”
The origins of these models are generally attributed to Clausius, though it could be rightly argued that Carnot had just as much, if not more, right to claim the mantle.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”