0 saved
9.4K views
You're improving, learning, getting faster, achieving more and getting ahead? No, you're not. Because everyone else is as well.
...Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Ita ne hoc quidem modo paria peccata sunt. Qui igitur convenit ab alia voluptate dicere naturam proficisci, in alia summum bonum ponere? Quae autem natura suae primae institutionis oblita est? Quis enim est, qui non videat haec esse in natura rerum tria? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sine ea igitur iucunde negat posse se vivere? Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget.
Superiores tres erant, quae esse possent, quarum est una sola defensa, eaque vehementer. Animi enim quoque dolores percipiet omnibus partibus maiores quam corporis. Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt.
Non quaeritur autem quid naturae tuae consentaneum sit, sed quid disciplinae. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Cenasti in vita numquam bene, cum omnia in ista Consumis squilla atque acupensere cum decimano. Qualem igitur hominem natura inchoavit? Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit.
- Research your competition
You cannot become better than your competitor if you are not aware of their st ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Tu vero, inquam, ducas licet, si sequetur; Superiores tres erant, quae esse possent, quarum est una sola defensa, eaque vehementer. Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Quid, quod homines infima fortuna, nulla spe rerum gerendarum, opifices denique delectantur historia? Theophrastus mediocriterne delectat, cum tractat locos ab Aristotele ante tractatos? An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sed vos squalidius, illorum vides quam niteat oratio. Cur tantas regiones barbarorum pedibus obiit, tot maria transmisit? De maximma autem re eodem modo, divina mente atque natura mundum universum et eius maxima partis administrari.
Cum id quoque, ut cupiebat, audivisset, evelli iussit eam, qua erat transfixus, hastam. Sedulo, inquam, faciam. Equidem etiam Epicurum, in physicis quidem, Democriteum puto. An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Hoc positum in Phaedro a Platone probavit Epicurus sensitque in omni disputatione id fieri oportere. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. Ut aliquid scire se gaudeant? Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Bork
Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Cupiditates non Epicuri divisione finiebat, sed sua satietate. Res enim concurrent contrariae. Item de contrariis, a quibus ad genera formasque generum venerunt. Ut nemo dubitet, eorum omnia officia quo spectare, quid sequi, quid fugere debeant? Quaerimus enim finem bonorum. An potest, inquit ille, quicquam esse suavius quam nihil dolere? Cupiditates non Epicuri divisione finiebat, sed sua satietate.
Being aware of the Red Queen Effect is not enough to guarantee success. Once you have come up with a concept that is foreign to your competition, you need to make sure you can move the new product or service past the idea phase, which usually requires capital, know-how, and the willingness to take risks.
The evolutionary ‘arms race’.
In the Selfish Gene, Richard Dawkins describes the “unequal cost of failure” in the evolutionary ‘arms race’. He describes the life/dinner principle captured in Aesop’s fables: “The rabbit runs faster than the fox, because the rabbit is running for his life while the fox is only running for his dinner.” There is a linked push to evolve and improve, with better adaptation in one species driving the other to make its own ‘leap forward’ to survive.
Buffet and developments in the textile industry.
The Farnam St Blog outlines the Red Queen Effect in some detail and includes the story of Buffett's approach to investing in the textile industry. Buffet wrote:
“Over the years, we had the option of making large capital expenditures in the textile operation that would have allowed us to somewhat reduce variable costs. But the promised benefits from these textile investments were illusory. Many of our competitors, both domestic and foreign, were stepping up to the same kind of expenditures and, once enough companies did so, their reduced costs became the baseline for reduced prices industrywide.
“Viewed individually, each company’s capital investment decision appeared cost-effective and rational; viewed collectively, the decisions neutralized each other and were irrational (just as happens when each person watching a parade decides he can see a little better if he stands on tiptoes). After each round of investment, all the players had more money in the game and returns remained anemic.”
While the Red Queen effect arose from biology, it can be applied to competition and innovation in other domains.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the Red Queen effect into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Mutually assured destruction: the Red Queen effect can be seen as a lens to understand the cold war.
- Blue ocean strategy: to consider changing the game rather than running faster.
Complementary models:
- Catalyst: in identifying rapid change opportunities over progressive development.
The name of this concept originated from Lewis Carroll’s famous sequel to Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Through the Looking Glass, where Alice observes that she needs to run faster and faster just to stay in the same place; the Red Queen’s reply to Alice’s perplexity is ‘Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!’
Evolutionary biologist Leigh Van Halen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis in 1973 to describe the constant race that co-evolving species engage in order to survive in a constantly changing environment populated with opposing organisms.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.