"Day 2 is stasis, followed by irrelevance, followed by excruciating painful decline, followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1 ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Utilitatis causa amicitia est quaesita. Ego quoque, inquit, didicerim libentius si quid attuleris, quam te reprehenderim. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quis enim confidit semper sibi illud stabile et firmum permansurum, quod fragile et caducum sit? Et quidem, inquit, vehementer errat; Res enim concurrent contrariae. Neque enim disputari sine reprehensione nec cum iracundia aut pertinacia recte disputari potest. Mene ergo et Triarium dignos existimas, apud quos turpiter loquare? Idque testamento cavebit is, qui nobis quasi oraculum ediderit nihil post mortem ad nos pertinere? Earum etiam rerum, quas terra gignit, educatio quaedam et perfectio est non dissimilis animantium. Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P. Nam si propter voluptatem, quae est ista laus, quae possit e macello peti? Nosti, credo, illud: Nemo pius est, qui pietatem-; Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Deinde qui fit, ut ego nesciam, sciant omnes, quicumque Epicurei esse voluerunt? Tu vero, inquam, ducas licet, si sequetur; Cum id quoque, ut cupiebat, audivisset, evelli iussit eam, qua erat transfixus, hastam. At quicum ioca seria, ut dicitur, quicum arcana, quicum occulta omnia?
- Choose a bias to action with reversible decisions.
Ask ‘what are the consequences of this de ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quo studio Aristophanem putamus aetatem in litteris duxisse? Inde igitur, inquit, ordiendum est. Putabam equidem satis, inquit, me dixisse. Pauca mutat vel plura sane; Is ita vivebat, ut nulla tam exquisita posset inveniri voluptas, qua non abundaret. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cupit enim dícere nihil posse ad beatam vitam deesse sapienti. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Hoc simile tandem est? Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis;
Est autem etiam actio quaedam corporis, quae motus et status naturae congruentis tenet; Verum tamen cum de rebus grandioribus dicas, ipsae res verba rapiunt; Sed tamen omne, quod de re bona dilucide dicitur, mihi praeclare dici videtur. Inde sermone vario sex illa a Dipylo stadia confecimus. Bork Virtutis, magnitudinis animi, patientiae, fortitudinis fomentis dolor mitigari solet.
Morbo gravissimo affectus, exul, orbus, egens, torqueatur eculeo: quem hunc appellas, Zeno? Semper enim ex eo, quod maximas partes continet latissimeque funditur, tota res appellatur. Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere? Hoc dictum in una re latissime patet, ut in omnibus factis re, non teste moveamur. Morbo gravissimo affectus, exul, orbus, egens, torqueatur eculeo: quem hunc appellas, Zeno? Sed in rebus apertissimis nimium longi sumus. Nondum autem explanatum satis, erat, quid maxime natura vellet.
Even reversible decisions have an Opportunity Cost. The time and effort invested in that choice and then possibly backtracking have a cost in relation to the option forgone.
At the same time, the examples provided by Bezos ‘using his gut’ and intuition are problematic when we consider behavioural economics, Fast and Slow Thinking, and unconscious bias.
It's true that experts have deep, often unconscious pattern recognition within their field of expertise so can often make reliable, fast, gut-based decisions. But it's also true that such gut reactions lack a rational consideration and are prone to be impacted on by countless heuristics, particularly in new and unfamiliar situations.
Greenlighting Amazon Prime.
Bezos has said that the decision to greenlight Amazon Prime was ultimately based on intuition because the data did not provide a clear way forward. He explains that this is a common challenge with a new, untested initiative.
Bezos said: “There wasn’t a single financially savvy person who supported the decision to launch Amazon Prime. Zero. Every spreadsheet showed that it was going to be a disaster. So that had to just be made with gut.”
“You collect as much data as you can. You immerse yourself in that data,” said Bezos, “but then make the decision with your heart.”
The high velocity decision model is a useful decision making framework for any individual or team wanting to increase their agility and work in a competitive environment.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave high velocity decisions into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Agile methodology: sharing the ideas of having a bias to action and testing ideas.
- Lean startup and minimum viable product: again, embracing the idea of quickly testing assumptions rather than discussing them forever.
Complementary models:
- Second order thinking: even if it is reversible, will the decision have second order and beyond implications that are irreversible?
- Circle of competence: making fast decisions from your circle of competence.
- Pareto principle: when making a decision based on 70 to 90% of the information, consider whether it includes the critical information.
- Inversion: considering what will be the cost of making the wrong decision in assessing whether it is reversible and what’s at stake.
- Redundancy/ margin of safety: to better make decisions with minimal risk.
- Fast and slow thinking: and the traps of relying on fast thinking.
- Availability heuristic: one of many cognitive biases that might arise from fast decision making.
- Prototypes: supporting a low risk approach to a bias for action.
This approach was described by Jeff Bezos in his 2016 letter to stakeholders. Here's how it starts:
“'Jeff, what does Day 2 look like?'
"That’s a question I just got at our most recent all-hands meeting. I’ve been reminding people that it’s Day 1 for a couple of decades. I work in an Amazon building named Day 1, and when I moved buildings, I took the name with me. I spend time thinking about this topic.
"'Day 2 is stasis. Followed by irrelevance. Followed by excruciating, painful decline. Followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1.'
"To be sure, this kind of decline would happen in extreme slow motion. An established company might harvest Day 2 for decades, but the final result would still come.
"I’m interested in the question, how do you fend off Day 2? What are the techniques and tactics? How do you keep the vitality of Day 1, even inside a large organization?
"Such a question can’t have a simple answer. There will be many elements, multiple paths, and many traps. I don’t know the whole answer, but I may know bits of it. Here’s a starter pack of essentials for Day 1 defense: customer obsession, a skeptical view of proxies, the eager adoption of external trends, and high-velocity decision making."
The essence of the following 'starter pack' has been summarised into the High-Velocity Decisions model that you've been exploring.
-
1410 days ago arun , CoFounder ModelThinkers & keynote speakerI was very proud that we managed to dig up this model. It's not widely talked about elsewhere, though there are many references about Bezos considering irreversible / reversible decisions, there aren't many sources that capture the 4 elements from the original shareholder letter. We really found the four elements in combination very powerful for any agile organistion.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”