What potential major life change simultaneously tempts and terrifies you? Got a startup idea you've been too scared to pursue? Want to cha ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Laboro autem non sine causa; Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Duae sunt enim res quoque, ne tu verba solum putes. Quod cum dixissent, ille contra.
Quod, inquit, quamquam voluptatibus quibusdam est saepe iucundius, tamen expetitur propter voluptatem. Se dicere inter honestum et turpe nimium quantum, nescio quid inmensum, inter ceteras res nihil omnino interesse. Erat enim Polemonis. Si enim, ut mihi quidem videtur, non explet bona naturae voluptas, iure praetermissa est; At habetur! Et ego id scilicet nesciebam! Sed ut sit, etiamne post mortem coletur? Quamquam tu hanc copiosiorem etiam soles dicere. Sed ad bona praeterita redeamus. Non semper, inquam;
Aut, Pylades cum sis, dices te esse Orestem, ut moriare pro amico? De malis autem et bonis ab iis animalibus, quae nondum depravata sint, ait optime iudicari. Non enim iam stirpis bonum quaeret, sed animalis. Non igitur potestis voluptate omnia dirigentes aut tueri aut retinere virtutem. Positum est a nostris in iis esse rebus, quae secundum naturam essent, non dolere; Sapientem locupletat ipsa natura, cuius divitias Epicurus parabiles esse docuit. Audeo dicere, inquit.
- Use the Regret Minimisation Framework to challenge fears and doubts
This mental model helps you ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Compensabatur, inquit, cum summis doloribus laetitia. Hi curatione adhibita levantur in dies, valet alter plus cotidie, alter videt. Respondent extrema primis, media utrisque, omnia omnibus. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. In quibus doctissimi illi veteres inesse quiddam caeleste et divinum putaverunt.
Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Consequens enim est et post oritur, ut dixi. Et quod est munus, quod opus sapientiae? Sine ea igitur iucunde negat posse se vivere? Tum ego: Non mehercule, inquam, soleo temere contra Stoicos, non quo illis admodum assentiar, sed pudore impedior; Ut necesse sit omnium rerum, quae natura vigeant, similem esse finem, non eundem.
Qua igitur re ab deo vincitur, si aeternitate non vincitur? Nam ista vestra: Si gravis, brevis; Serpere anguiculos, nare anaticulas, evolare merulas, cornibus uti videmus boves, nepas aculeis. Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Scaevola tribunus plebis ferret ad plebem vellentne de ea re quaeri. Ergo id est convenienter naturae vivere, a natura discedere.
The Regret Minimisation Framework tends to take an emotive approach to decision making that might lead people to take riskier actions than are advisable. At worst, when not used with other decision making considerations, it might be used to justify hasty or even reckless behaviour. To that point, rather than an considered decision making tool, it might be argued that this framework is more about helping to gain the courage and fortitude to commit to something significant that you know you want but are scared of doing.
Bezos starting Amazon
Bezos described how he left his well paying job and to start Amazon.
“The framework I found, which made the decision incredibly easy, was what I called — which only a nerd would call — a “regret minimisation framework. So I wanted to project myself forward to age 80 and say, “Okay, now I’m looking back on my life. I want to have minimized the number of regrets I have.
“I knew that when I was 80 I was not going to regret having tried this. I was not going to regret trying to participate in this thing called the Internet that I thought was going to be a really big deal. I knew that if I failed I wouldn’t regret that, but I knew the one thing I might regret is not ever having tried."
The regret minimisation framework is a decision-making approach that would ideally be combined with other decision making process.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave regret minimisation framework into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- High velocity decisions: other decision making tools from Bezos.
- Opportunity cost: the regret minimisation framework effectively asks you to ‘live into’ the opportunity cost of inaction.
Complementary models:
- Golden circle: using the framework might help connect with ‘why’.
- Ikigai: again, the framework might help get in touch with a happier life.
- Risk matrix: consider risks likelihood and impact.
This is a similar concept to the more recent ‘YOLO’, or you only live once’ approach to seizing opportunities.
The Regret Minimisation Framework was coined by Jeff Bezos, and described in Brian Christian’s Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions.
View a short video of Bezos talking about this framework.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”