0 saved
9.9K views
Are you struggling to motivate yourself or others to reach goals?
The G ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quod autem meum munus dicis non equidem recuso, sed te adiungo socium. Ergo id est convenienter naturae vivere, a natura discedere. Nonne videmus quanta perturbatio rerum omnium consequatur, quanta confusio? Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. Bonum incolumis acies: misera caecitas. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Tenesne igitur, inquam, Hieronymus Rhodius quid dicat esse summum bonum, quo putet omnia referri oportere? Nosti, credo, illud: Nemo pius est, qui pietatem-; Eam si varietatem diceres, intellegerem, ut etiam non dicente te intellego; Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Sed quod proximum fuit non vidit. Ego quoque, inquit, didicerim libentius si quid attuleris, quam te reprehenderim. Tollenda est atque extrahenda radicitus. Nam cui proposito sit conservatio sui, necesse est huic partes quoque sui caras suo genere laudabiles. Quid enim est a Chrysippo praetermissum in Stoicis? Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt.
- Show progress towards a goal.
Provide your audience with a visual representati ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed tamen omne, quod de re bona dilucide dicitur, mihi praeclare dici videtur. Dulce amarum, leve asperum, prope longe, stare movere, quadratum rotundum. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Videamus igitur sententias eorum, tum ad verba redeamus. Nunc agendum est subtilius. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Id enim natura desiderat. Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit; Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti. Eadem fortitudinis ratio reperietur. Tu vero, inquam, ducas licet, si sequetur; Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. O magnam vim ingenii causamque iustam, cur nova existeret disciplina! Perge porro. Ex quo illud efficitur, qui bene cenent omnis libenter cenare, qui libenter, non continuo bene. Quo plebiscito decreta a senatu est consuli quaestio Cn.
Theophrasti igitur, inquit, tibi liber ille placet de beata vita? Idcirco enim non desideraret, quia, quod dolore caret, id in voluptate est. Sequitur disserendi ratio cognitioque naturae; Ab hoc autem quaedam non melius quam veteres, quaedam omnino relicta. Sit hoc ultimum bonorum, quod nunc a me defenditur; Sed quot homines, tot sententiae;
A variation on the Goal Gradient Effect was posed by marketing academic and researcher Andrea Bonezzi, who argued that “motivation to engage in goal-consistent behavior can be higher when people are either far from or close to the end state and lower when they are about halfway to the end state.” Thus rather than focusing on the end aspect of the journey, Bonezzi describes a ‘U-shaped’ model of motivation, with the problematic middle between starting point and end goal.
Contributing to charities.
This study entitled Goal Gradient in Helping Behavior, found that “People are more likely to pitch in as charitable campaigns approach their goals. Such “goal gradient helping” occurs in part because late-stage efforts provide donors with a heightened sense of personal impact, an influential source of satisfaction from prosocial acts.”
Car wash loyalty.
This 2006 study, similar to the cited coffee loyalty card example in the summary above, used loyalty cards for a car wash. In this case, one card had 8 spots to fill for a free car wash, the other had 10 with two already stamped. The group given the perceived head start resulted in a 34% engagement rate in the loyalty program compared to 19% for the others.
d
The Goal Gradient Effect was first identified by Clark Hull during the 1930s in relation to animals, particularly his study of rats accelerating their pace closer to the end of a maze and a food reward. Hull, an engineer by background, went on to break down his observations and interpret them as a mathematical formula which he outlined in his book Principles of Behaviour.
The effect was expanded to humans in a 2006 study by Ran Kivetz et al. The authors of that study explained: “The key findings indicate that (1) participants in a real café reward program purchase coffee more frequently the closer they are to earning a free coffee; (2) Internet users who rate songs in return for reward certificates visit the rating Web site more often, rate more songs per visit, and persist longer in the rating effort as they approach the reward goal; (3) the illusion of progress toward the goal induces purchase acceleration (e.g., customers who receive a 12-stamp coffee card with 2 preexisting “bonus” stamps complete the 10 required purchases faster than customers who receive a “regular” 10-stamp card); and (4) a stronger tendency to accelerate toward the goal predicts greater retention and faster reengagement in the program.”
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.