Use this model to frame and inform your negotiation strategy.
Best Alternative to a Negotia ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. Contineo me ab exemplis. Qui autem diffidet perpetuitati bonorum suorum, timeat necesse est, ne aliquando amissis illis sit miser. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cum praesertim illa perdiscere ludus esset. Cur haec eadem Democritus? Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. Quod cum dixissent, ille contra. Ipse Epicurus fortasse redderet, ut Sextus Peducaeus, Sex. At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit. Quae cum essent dicta, finem fecimus et ambulandi et disputandi. In qua si nihil est praeter rationem, sit in una virtute finis bonorum; Cur igitur, cum de re conveniat, non malumus usitate loqui? Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Quamquam haec quidem praeposita recte et reiecta dicere licebit. Ut in voluptate sit, qui epuletur, in dolore, qui torqueatur. An vero, inquit, quisquam potest probare, quod perceptfum, quod. Quis est, qui non oderit libidinosam, protervam adolescentiam?
- Know your exact BATNA.
Create a list of actions you can take if no agreement is reached and choose the m ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mihi enim erit isdem istis fortasse iam utendum. At iste non dolendi status non vocatur voluptas. Neminem videbis ita laudatum, ut artifex callidus comparandarum voluptatum diceretur. Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc?
Quamvis enim depravatae non sint, pravae tamen esse possunt. Non ego tecum iam ita iocabor, ut isdem his de rebus, cum L. Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Facile est hoc cernere in primis puerorum aetatulis. Hi curatione adhibita levantur in dies, valet alter plus cotidie, alter videt. Si longus, levis; Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Ergo id est convenienter naturae vivere, a natura discedere. Iam in altera philosophiae parte. At miser, si in flagitiosa et vitiosa vita afflueret voluptatibus.
Quam si explicavisset, non tam haesitaret. Haec et tu ita posuisti, et verba vestra sunt. Nam si amitti vita beata potest, beata esse non potest. Nulla erit controversia. Ita graviter et severe voluptatem secrevit a bono. Nam illud vehementer repugnat, eundem beatum esse et multis malis oppressum.
Your BATNA's strength can easily be affected by unexpected changes in conditions. At the same time, determining BATNAs for you and your counterparty is difficult due to subjectivity, as we have a tendency to overestimate the strength of our BATNA and to underestimate the strength of the other side's BATNA.
Other factors influencing BATNA, like relationship value and the likelihood of the other party maintaining their side of the bargain are also difficult to value and measure in a quantifiable manner.
Finally, using BATNA as a mental model to assist in negotiations should not be counterposed to developing rapport, active listening and other methods to connect and find potential win-win options.
The Brexit BATNA.
In August 2018 British Prime Minister Theresa May revealed a plan of contingency for exiting the European Union (E.U.) if the so-called Brexit negotiations ended in an impasse, revealing the Government’s BATNA to quell the public’s fears.
Salary negotiation.
In a salary negotiation, the employee might have a basic BATNA of their current salary, assuming that the negotiation will not end with them losing their job. They might increase this by applying for an alternative position with a higher salary, which will become their new BATNA. In such a case, it is not a like for like comparison so the BATNA might become difficult to assess. For the company, they must consider the cost of losing the staff member if they do not meet their expectations. Again this cost is hard to measure.
BATNA is a fundamental mental model in negotiation theory.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave BATNA into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- WATNA: the worst alternative to a negotiated agreement is the other side of this equation.
- Opportunity cost: BATNA is essentially the same as opportunity cost, applied to the specific purpose of negotiations.
Complementary models:
- Porter's five forces: particularly as it relates to the bargaining power of suppliers.
- Non-violent communication: challenges this model in attempting to find a win-win alternative.
- Cialidini’s six principles of persuasion: a powerful option used in conjunction with any negotiation process.
- Mutually assured destruction: where the BATNAs result in disaster for both parties, negotiation becomes an imperative.
- Cost-benefit analysis: in considering BATNA.
- Sunk cost fallacy: to support walking away from a protracted, even expensive negotiation.
BATNA was created by negotiation researchers Roger Fisher and William Ury of the Harvard Program on Negotiation and presented in their fundamental 1981 book Getting to Yes: Negotiating Without Giving In.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”