0 saved
8.7K views
There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Audeo dicere, inquit. Modo etiam paulum ad dexteram de via declinavi, ut ad Pericli sepulcrum accederem.
Est tamen ea secundum naturam multoque nos ad se expetendam magis hortatur quam superiora omnia. Hoc enim constituto in philosophia constituta sunt omnia. Age nunc isti doceant, vel tu potius quis enim ista melius? Certe, nisi voluptatem tanti aestimaretis. Sit sane ista voluptas. Sed hoc sane concedamus. Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis. Intrandum est igitur in rerum naturam et penitus quid ea postulet pervidendum;
Si enim ad populum me vocas, eum. Idemne, quod iucunde? A quibus propter discendi cupiditatem videmus ultimas terras esse peragratas. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Gracchum patrem non beatiorem fuisse quam fillum, cum alter stabilire rem publicam studuerit, alter evertere. Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. In quibus doctissimi illi veteres inesse quiddam caeleste et divinum putaverunt. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Nihil ad rem! Ne sit sane; Claudii libidini, qui tum erat summo ne imperio, dederetur.
Haec igitur Epicuri non probo, inquam. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Is es profecto tu. Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. In qua si nihil est praeter rationem, sit in una virtute finis bonorum; Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Quid enim me prohiberet Epicureum esse, si probarem, quae ille diceret? Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Haec et tu ita posuisti, et verba vestra sunt. Cur ipse Pythagoras et Aegyptum lustravit et Persarum magos adiit? Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Itaque hic ipse iam pridem est reiectus;
In quibus doctissimi illi veteres inesse quiddam caeleste et divinum putaverunt. Cum autem negant ea quicquam ad beatam vitam pertinere, rursus naturam relinquunt. Qui potest igitur habitare in beata vita summi mali metus? Hoc non est positum in nostra actione.
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.