There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. Itaque nostrum est-quod nostrum dico, artis est-ad ea principia, quae accepimus. Atqui perspicuum est hominem e corpore animoque constare, cum primae sint animi partes, secundae corporis. Idem fecisset Epicurus, si sententiam hanc, quae nunc Hieronymi est, coniunxisset cum Aristippi vetere sententia. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quacumque enim ingredimur, in aliqua historia vestigium ponimus. Ut alios omittam, hunc appello, quem ille unum secutus est. Ego vero volo in virtute vim esse quam maximam; Si enim ita est, vide ne facinus facias, cum mori suadeas.
Res enim se praeclare habebat, et quidem in utraque parte. Deinde dolorem quem maximum? Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Diodorus, eius auditor, adiungit ad honestatem vacuitatem doloris. Quid dubitas igitur mutare principia naturae?
Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint. Negat enim summo bono afferre incrementum diem. Ita multo sanguine profuso in laetitia et in victoria est mortuus. Id enim volumus, id contendimus, ut officii fructus sit ipsum officium. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum. Nam diligi et carum esse iucundum est propterea, quia tutiorem vitam et voluptatem pleniorem efficit. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam.
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed nimis multa. Quid sequatur, quid repugnet, vident. Tollitur beneficium, tollitur gratia, quae sunt vincla concordiae. Duae sunt enim res quoque, ne tu verba solum putes.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Putabam equidem satis, inquit, me dixisse. Verum esto: verbum ipsum voluptatis non habet dignitatem, nec nos fortasse intellegimus. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Proclivi currit oratio. Haec dicuntur inconstantissime.
Nullus est igitur cuiusquam dies natalis. Cur deinde Metrodori liberos commendas? Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Somnum denique nobis, nisi requietem corporibus et is medicinam quandam laboris afferret, contra naturam putaremus datum; Quem Tiberina descensio festo illo die tanto gaudio affecit, quanto L. Superiores tres erant, quae esse possent, quarum est una sola defensa, eaque vehementer. In qua si nihil est praeter rationem, sit in una virtute finis bonorum; Qui convenit?
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”