0 saved
11.3K views
There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret? Cur fortior sit, si illud, quod tute concedis, asperum et vix ferendum putabit? Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Quae cum praeponunt, ut sit aliqua rerum selectio, naturam videntur sequi;
Atque haec ita iustitiae propria sunt, ut sint virtutum reliquarum communia. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Sed fortuna fortis; Cum praesertim illa perdiscere ludus esset.
Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur? In his igitur partibus duabus nihil erat, quod Zeno commutare gestiret. Sed in rebus apertissimis nimium longi sumus. Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Qui enim existimabit posse se miserum esse beatus non erit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Unum nescio, quo modo possit, si luxuriosus sit, finitas cupiditates habere. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas?
Neminem videbis ita laudatum, ut artifex callidus comparandarum voluptatum diceretur. Ita relinquet duas, de quibus etiam atque etiam consideret.
Quid est enim aliud esse versutum? Ita relinquet duas, de quibus etiam atque etiam consideret. Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina. Sed eum qui audiebant, quoad poterant, defendebant sententiam suam. Paulum, cum regem Persem captum adduceret, eodem flumine invectio? Haeret in salebra. Qui autem esse poteris, nisi te amor ipse ceperit? Quare obscurentur etiam haec, quae secundum naturam esse dicimus, in vita beata;
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.