0 saved
11.6K views
There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Gerendus est mos, modo recte sentiat. Fortasse id optimum, sed ubi illud: Plus semper voluptatis? At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Quis, quaeso, illum negat et bonum virum et comem et humanum fuisse? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Rhetorice igitur, inquam, nos mavis quam dialectice disputare? Sed ille, ut dixi, vitiose. Est enim effectrix multarum et magnarum voluptatum.
Sit hoc ultimum bonorum, quod nunc a me defenditur; Etiam beatissimum? An vero displicuit ea, quae tributa est animi virtutibus tanta praestantia? Teneo, inquit, finem illi videri nihil dolere. Istic sum, inquit. Quae cum magnifice primo dici viderentur, considerata minus probabantur. Quis est tam dissimile homini. Atque his de rebus et splendida est eorum et illustris oratio. Nihilo beatiorem esse Metellum quam Regulum. Nummus in Croesi divitiis obscuratur, pars est tamen divitiarum. Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re;
Sin tantum modo ad indicia veteris memoriae cognoscenda, curiosorum. Quod autem satis est, eo quicquid accessit, nimium est; Sed vos squalidius, illorum vides quam niteat oratio. Aliter enim explicari, quod quaeritur, non potest. Itaque primos congressus copulationesque et consuetudinum instituendarum voluntates fieri propter voluptatem;
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Illa videamus, quae a te de amicitia dicta sunt. Sed tu istuc dixti bene Latine, parum plane. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Quamquam te quidem video minime esse deterritum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Si quae forte-possumus. Quos nisi redarguimus, omnis virtus, omne decus, omnis vera laus deserenda est.
Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Dolere malum est: in crucem qui agitur, beatus esse non potest.
Quid est, quod ab ea absolvi et perfici debeat? Scrupulum, inquam, abeunti; Bonum negas esse divitias, praeposìtum esse dicis? Magni enim aestimabat pecuniam non modo non contra leges, sed etiam legibus partam. Nondum autem explanatum satis, erat, quid maxime natura vellet. Nos paucis ad haec additis finem faciamus aliquando; Quae enim adhuc protulisti, popularia sunt, ego autem a te elegantiora desidero. Istic sum, inquit.
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.