0 saved
17K views
Whether you’re writing fiction, starting a marketing campaign, crafting a pitch, or trying to ride the ups and downs of an entrepreneurial li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ergo omni animali illud, quod appetiti positum est in eo, quod naturae est accommodatum. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore. Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Illud quaero, quid ei, qui in voluptate summum bonum ponat, consentaneum sit dicere.
Et homini, qui ceteris animantibus plurimum praestat, praecipue a natura nihil datum esse dicemus? Aut unde est hoc contritum vetustate proverbium: quicum in tenebris? Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Amicitiam autem adhibendam esse censent, quia sit ex eo genere, quae prosunt. Verum esto: verbum ipsum voluptatis non habet dignitatem, nec nos fortasse intellegimus. Age, inquies, ista parva sunt.
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Tu autem, si tibi illa probabantur, cur non propriis verbis ea tenebas? Theophrasti igitur, inquit, tibi liber ille placet de beata vita? Tum Quintus: Est plane, Piso, ut dicis, inquit. Ergo et avarus erit, sed finite, et adulter, verum habebit modum, et luxuriosus eodem modo. Non est igitur voluptas bonum. Sint modo partes vitae beatae. Non quaeritur autem quid naturae tuae consentaneum sit, sed quid disciplinae.
- Create narratives with this structure in mind.
Rather than follow the model religiously, use it as ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nihilo magis. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Tum Torquatus: Prorsus, inquit, assentior; Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Iis igitur est difficilius satis facere, qui se Latina scripta dicunt contemnere. Stoici autem, quod finem bonorum in una virtute ponunt, similes sunt illorum; Apud ceteros autem philosophos, qui quaesivit aliquid, tacet;
Sed quid attinet de rebus tam apertis plura requirere? Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. Equidem e Cn. At enim, qua in vita est aliquid mali, ea beata esse non potest. Sed quid minus probandum quam esse aliquem beatum nec satis beatum? Sine ea igitur iucunde negat posse se vivere? Sed quid minus probandum quam esse aliquem beatum nec satis beatum? Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam.
Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Cur id non ita fit? Tollenda est atque extrahenda radicitus. Quam si explicavisset, non tam haesitaret. Quid enim me prohiberet Epicureum esse, si probarem, quae ille diceret? Qui enim voluptatem ipsam contemnunt, iis licet dicere se acupenserem maenae non anteponere. Illa videamus, quae a te de amicitia dicta sunt. Illis videtur, qui illud non dubitant bonum dicere -;
There were many critiques about whether or not Campbell’s original model really applied to folklore, or whether he selectively cited his examples. At the same time, his model which referenced such things as ‘meeting with goddess’ and ‘woman as temptress’ was rightly critiqued from a feminist perspective. I would argue that the updated model from Vogler does address many of these issues, especially when seen as a ‘loose framework’ rather than a tight script.
Another criticism is about its complexity and therefore usefulness to be applied. Vogler obviously reduced and streamlined the stages from 17 to 12 but even so it might be too much for some applications. Indeed, Dan Harmon, who was behind Community and Rick and Morty, simplified it further to the story circle which consists of 8 stages: a character in comfort; they want something; they enter an unfamiliar situation; they adapt; they get what they wanted; they pay a price; they return to their familiar situation; they’ve changed.
Perhaps the biggest criticism in a business context is that the approach is too bloated for a busy, overwhelmed audience. If that’s the case, Minto’s Pyramid or other models might be a better approach.
So many examples.
Many examples have been cited to back up the relevance of the Hero’s Journey in storytelling. I particularly like this wonderful infographic explaining how it applies in popular movies such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Matrix, Spiderman, the Lion King and the Lord of the Rings.
The hero’s journey is a fundamental, persistent and broadly used model in storytelling.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the hero’s journey into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Three act model: a three act approach to storytelling.
- Minto's pyramid: it’s different but the simplified business focused narrative structure bares some resemblance.
Complementary models:
- Journey map: use the hero’s journey to provide a structure to a customer journey.
- Design thinking: to empathise with a protagonist or customer as part of telling their story.
- Lean startup: tell your entrepreneurial story with the hero’s journey.
- Non violent communication: another communication model that you might incorporate with the hero's journey to express yourself in a more compelling way.
First described in 1949 by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the hero’s journey, or monomyth, aimed to capture the universal or archetypal story element found everywhere. Campbell originally described 17 stages to the model. Our diagram references the modernised and simplified version presented by Christopher Vogler in his 2007 book, The Writer’s Journey, though we have still cited Campbell as the model’s originator.
For more, watch this animated video about the hero’s journey from TedEd. Or, for my favourite video on the topic, view the Glove and Boots puppet inspired explanation of the character archetypes in the hero’s journey.
The Emma Coates framework mentioned in the summary above came from this Pixar story page by David Price.
My Notes
-
1233 days ago mlrAnother limitation is the gendered nature of Campbell's model - the heroine's journey is different and well documented. The male-gendered (Campbell) hero figure acts alone, sacrifices his connections with family and society, and seeks goals that ultimately exile him from society. In contrast, the female-gendered heroine responds to a loss of power by turning to friends and family for assistance; she enables others to have agency and demonstrate their own talents; and when she regains power, there's usually a compromise solution that is designed to bring benefits to all sides. See Gail Carriger (2020) The Heroine's Journey for a fast, easy-to-read summary of both models, as applied to writing novels and movies. https://gailcarriger.com/books/the-heroines-journey-for-authors-book/
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.