0 saved
17.3K views
Whether you’re writing fiction, starting a marketing campaign, crafting a pitch, or trying to ride the ups and downs of an entrepreneurial li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ac tamen hic mallet non dolere. Sed haec omittamus; Atque haec ita iustitiae propria sunt, ut sint virtutum reliquarum communia. Quid sequatur, quid repugnet, vident. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. His enim rebus detractis negat se reperire in asotorum vita quod reprehendat. Naturales divitias dixit parabiles esse, quod parvo esset natura contenta. Summus dolor plures dies manere non potest? Nummus in Croesi divitiis obscuratur, pars est tamen divitiarum. Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere.
Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Bork Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. Bonum integritas corporis: misera debilitas. Si alia sentit, inquam, alia loquitur, numquam intellegam quid sentiat; Dicet pro me ipsa virtus nec dubitabit isti vestro beato M. Omnis enim est natura diligens sui.
Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Utilitatis causa amicitia est quaesita. Vulgo enim dicitur: Iucundi acti labores, nec male Euripidesconcludam, si potero, Latine; A mene tu? Quae in controversiam veniunt, de iis, si placet, disseramus. Cuius ad naturam apta ratio vera illa et summa lex a philosophis dicitur. Sed ne, dum huic obsequor, vobis molestus sim. Materiam vero rerum et copiam apud hos exilem, apud illos uberrimam reperiemus. Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur.
- Create narratives with this structure in mind.
Rather than follow the model religiously, use it as ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Iubet igitur nos Pythius Apollo noscere nosmet ipsos. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nec vero alia sunt quaerenda contra Carneadeam illam sententiam. Apud imperitos tum illa dicta sunt, aliquid etiam coronae datum; Sed quot homines, tot sententiae; Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis.
Quae hic rei publicae vulnera inponebat, eadem ille sanabat. Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit; Cur ipse Pythagoras et Aegyptum lustravit et Persarum magos adiit? Praeclare enim Plato: Beatum, cui etiam in senectute contigerit, ut sapientiam verasque opiniones assequi possit. Cum audissem Antiochum, Brute, ut solebam, cum M. Itaque et manendi in vita et migrandi ratio omnis iis rebus, quas supra dixi, metienda. Tanta vis admonitionis inest in locis; At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit;
Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Is ita vivebat, ut nulla tam exquisita posset inveniri voluptas, qua non abundaret. Ex eorum enim scriptis et institutis cum omnis doctrina liberalis, omnis historia. Quod praeceptum quia maius erat, quam ut ab homine videretur, idcirco assignatum est deo. Si est nihil nisi corpus, summa erunt illa: valitudo, vacuitas doloris, pulchritudo, cetera. Sin aliud quid voles, postea. Duo enim genera quae erant, fecit tria. Summae mihi videtur inscitiae.
There were many critiques about whether or not Campbell’s original model really applied to folklore, or whether he selectively cited his examples. At the same time, his model which referenced such things as ‘meeting with goddess’ and ‘woman as temptress’ was rightly critiqued from a feminist perspective. I would argue that the updated model from Vogler does address many of these issues, especially when seen as a ‘loose framework’ rather than a tight script.
Another criticism is about its complexity and therefore usefulness to be applied. Vogler obviously reduced and streamlined the stages from 17 to 12 but even so it might be too much for some applications. Indeed, Dan Harmon, who was behind Community and Rick and Morty, simplified it further to the story circle which consists of 8 stages: a character in comfort; they want something; they enter an unfamiliar situation; they adapt; they get what they wanted; they pay a price; they return to their familiar situation; they’ve changed.
Perhaps the biggest criticism in a business context is that the approach is too bloated for a busy, overwhelmed audience. If that’s the case, Minto’s Pyramid or other models might be a better approach.
So many examples.
Many examples have been cited to back up the relevance of the Hero’s Journey in storytelling. I particularly like this wonderful infographic explaining how it applies in popular movies such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Matrix, Spiderman, the Lion King and the Lord of the Rings.
The hero’s journey is a fundamental, persistent and broadly used model in storytelling.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the hero’s journey into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Three act model: a three act approach to storytelling.
- Minto's pyramid: it’s different but the simplified business focused narrative structure bares some resemblance.
Complementary models:
- Journey map: use the hero’s journey to provide a structure to a customer journey.
- Design thinking: to empathise with a protagonist or customer as part of telling their story.
- Lean startup: tell your entrepreneurial story with the hero’s journey.
- Non violent communication: another communication model that you might incorporate with the hero's journey to express yourself in a more compelling way.
First described in 1949 by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the hero’s journey, or monomyth, aimed to capture the universal or archetypal story element found everywhere. Campbell originally described 17 stages to the model. Our diagram references the modernised and simplified version presented by Christopher Vogler in his 2007 book, The Writer’s Journey, though we have still cited Campbell as the model’s originator.
For more, watch this animated video about the hero’s journey from TedEd. Or, for my favourite video on the topic, view the Glove and Boots puppet inspired explanation of the character archetypes in the hero’s journey.
The Emma Coates framework mentioned in the summary above came from this Pixar story page by David Price.
My Notes
-
1254 days ago mlrAnother limitation is the gendered nature of Campbell's model - the heroine's journey is different and well documented. The male-gendered (Campbell) hero figure acts alone, sacrifices his connections with family and society, and seeks goals that ultimately exile him from society. In contrast, the female-gendered heroine responds to a loss of power by turning to friends and family for assistance; she enables others to have agency and demonstrate their own talents; and when she regains power, there's usually a compromise solution that is designed to bring benefits to all sides. See Gail Carriger (2020) The Heroine's Journey for a fast, easy-to-read summary of both models, as applied to writing novels and movies. https://gailcarriger.com/books/the-heroines-journey-for-authors-book/
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.