0 saved
11.9K views
So you suck at delayed gratification? Can’t consistently invest your savings for the big pay off for when you retire? Or perhaps you’re ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Inscite autem medicinae et gubernationis ultimum cum ultimo sapientiae comparatur. Immo videri fortasse. Suo enim quisque studio maxime ducitur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nondum autem explanatum satis, erat, quid maxime natura vellet.
Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum. Et summatim quidem haec erant de corpore animoque dicenda, quibus quasi informatum est quid hominis natura postulet. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates?
Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Atque ab his initiis profecti omnium virtutum et originem et progressionem persecuti sunt. At modo dixeras nihil in istis rebus esse, quod interesset. Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis; Videmus igitur ut conquiescere ne infantes quidem possint. Istam voluptatem perpetuam quis potest praestare sapienti?
- For decisions, use slow thinking to interrupt your bias.
Organise processes or teams to interrupt ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Faceres tu quidem, Torquate, haec omnia; Quo invento omnis ab eo quasi capite de summo bono et malo disputatio ducitur. Tuo vero id quidem, inquam, arbitratu. Atqui iste locus est, Piso, tibi etiam atque etiam confirmandus, inquam;
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ex ea difficultate illae fallaciloquae, ut ait Accius, malitiae natae sunt. Sed ille, ut dixi, vitiose. Ergo adhuc, quantum equidem intellego, causa non videtur fuisse mutandi nominis. Sed utrum hortandus es nobis, Luci, inquit, an etiam tua sponte propensus es? Quae diligentissime contra Aristonem dicuntur a Chryippo. Semper enim ita adsumit aliquid, ut ea, quae prima dederit, non deserat.
Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Nihil ad rem! Ne sit sane; Cur igitur, inquam, res tam dissimiles eodem nomine appellas? Item de contrariis, a quibus ad genera formasque generum venerunt. Nihil acciderat ei, quod nollet, nisi quod anulum, quo delectabatur, in mari abiecerat. Quid enim tanto opus est instrumento in optimis artibus comparandis? Ego quoque, inquit, didicerim libentius si quid attuleris, quam te reprehenderim.
Some criticise the evidence behind Hyperbolic Discounting as, similar to so many behavioural science research, largely relying on university students as they are a cheap and available group of test subjects. Such critics argue that more experienced and older people consider longer views and criteria for their decision making, though this has not been proven through research yet.
Other criticisms do not undermine the observed behaviour behind Hyperbolic Discounting — of people choosing instant gratification — rather the reasoning behind it. So, for example, some point to the role of cravings, arousal and emotions in people seeking immediate rewards — though again, in my view this is relatively academic as the end result remains the same.
$100 versus $120.
Hyperbolic discounting is perhaps best known for the $100 versus $120 experiment. Participants in this experiment were offered a choice between receiving $100 today versus $120 in a week. Most people would choose the $100 immediately. Then they were offered the choice between $100 in a year versus $120 in a year and a week. From a rational perspective, these questions are identical — yet when adding the ‘year’, most people chose to take the $120 option.
Climate change.
This one’s a bit opinionated perhaps, but is it really? It is now pretty clear that climate change is a massive threat to humanity — there, I said it. Yet humans are reticent to act. Compare that to how most governments invested in dealing with the threat of covid when it was having clear immediate impacts. The immediate threat gets the attention, the distant one can be all too easily ignored.
Hyperbolic discounting is a core model in behavioural economics and has countless implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave hyperbolic discounting into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: the model that explains the broader backdrop of heuristics and behavioural economics.
- Loss aversion: another fundamental and intrinsically linked model
Complementary models:
- Habit loop: particularly B.J. Foggs idea of ‘tiny habits’ or immediate rewards.
- Systems versus goals: in establishing the routine over relying on a distant goal.
- Divide and conquer: in respect to breaking down large projects.
- Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion: particularly in terms of freemium and quick value in relation to reciprocity.
Hyperbolic discounting was built on the work of Richard Hernstein who developed a ‘matching law’ before coining the term ‘hyperbolic discounting’ in a 1961 paper.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.