What potential major life change simultaneously tempts and terrifies you? Got a startup idea you've been too scared to pursue? Want to cha ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti. Piso igitur hoc modo, vir optimus tuique, ut scis, amantissimus. Post enim Chrysippum eum non sane est disputatum.
Suam denique cuique naturam esse ad vivendum ducem. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Verum tamen cum de rebus grandioribus dicas, ipsae res verba rapiunt; Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Vitiosum est enim in dividendo partem in genere numerare. Zenonis est, inquam, hoc Stoici. Facit igitur Lucius noster prudenter, qui audire de summo bono potissimum velit; Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant.
Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Sin autem est in ea, quod quidam volunt, nihil impedit hanc nostram comprehensionem summi boni. Quae duo sunt, unum facit. Ita prorsus, inquam; Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re; Itaque mihi non satis videmini considerare quod iter sit naturae quaeque progressio.
- Use the Regret Minimisation Framework to challenge fears and doubts
This mental model helps you ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Totum autem id externum est, et quod externum, id in casu est. Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. Cur fortior sit, si illud, quod tute concedis, asperum et vix ferendum putabit? At cum de plurimis eadem dicit, tum certe de maximis. Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. Quorum sine causa fieri nihil putandum est. Facit igitur Lucius noster prudenter, qui audire de summo bono potissimum velit;
Quae enim adhuc protulisti, popularia sunt, ego autem a te elegantiora desidero. Huic mori optimum esse propter desperationem sapientiae, illi propter spem vivere. Quod autem satis est, eo quicquid accessit, nimium est; Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Quid ergo attinet gloriose loqui, nisi constanter loquare? Qui non moveatur et offensione turpitudinis et comprobatione honestatis? Maximus dolor, inquit, brevis est.
The Regret Minimisation Framework tends to take an emotive approach to decision making that might lead people to take riskier actions than are advisable. At worst, when not used with other decision making considerations, it might be used to justify hasty or even reckless behaviour. To that point, rather than an considered decision making tool, it might be argued that this framework is more about helping to gain the courage and fortitude to commit to something significant that you know you want but are scared of doing.
Bezos starting Amazon
Bezos described how he left his well paying job and to start Amazon.
“The framework I found, which made the decision incredibly easy, was what I called — which only a nerd would call — a “regret minimisation framework. So I wanted to project myself forward to age 80 and say, “Okay, now I’m looking back on my life. I want to have minimized the number of regrets I have.
“I knew that when I was 80 I was not going to regret having tried this. I was not going to regret trying to participate in this thing called the Internet that I thought was going to be a really big deal. I knew that if I failed I wouldn’t regret that, but I knew the one thing I might regret is not ever having tried."
The regret minimisation framework is a decision-making approach that would ideally be combined with other decision making process.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave regret minimisation framework into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- High velocity decisions: other decision making tools from Bezos.
- Opportunity cost: the regret minimisation framework effectively asks you to ‘live into’ the opportunity cost of inaction.
Complementary models:
- Golden circle: using the framework might help connect with ‘why’.
- Ikigai: again, the framework might help get in touch with a happier life.
- Risk matrix: consider risks likelihood and impact.
This is a similar concept to the more recent ‘YOLO’, or you only live once’ approach to seizing opportunities.
The Regret Minimisation Framework was coined by Jeff Bezos, and described in Brian Christian’s Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions.
View a short video of Bezos talking about this framework.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”