No matter what you thought about the end of the HBO version of Game of Thrones, it’s worth considering George R.R. Ma ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Ergo opifex plus sibi proponet ad formarum quam civis excellens ad factorum pulchritudinem? Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ergo, si semel tristior effectus est, hilara vita amissa est? Hunc vos beatum; Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc? Aliter enim explicari, quod quaeritur, non potest. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Varietates autem iniurasque fortunae facile veteres philosophorum praeceptis instituta vita superabat.
Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? Quis est, qui non oderit libidinosam, protervam adolescentiam? Quod non faceret, si in voluptate summum bonum poneret. Ita fit cum gravior, tum etiam splendidior oratio. Non minor, inquit, voluptas percipitur ex vilissimis rebus quam ex pretiosissimis. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Virtutibus igitur rectissime mihi videris et ad consuetudinem nostrae orationis vitia posuisse contraria. Haec et tu ita posuisti, et verba vestra sunt. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt.
Quamquam non negatis nos intellegere quid sit voluptas, sed quid ille dicat. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Itaque sensibus rationem adiunxit et ratione effecta sensus non reliquit. Longum est enim ad omnia respondere, quae a te dicta sunt. At modo dixeras nihil in istis rebus esse, quod interesset. Verum esto: verbum ipsum voluptatis non habet dignitatem, nec nos fortasse intellegimus.
- Understand your preference and strengths.
Do you naturally lean towards being an Archite ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cuius similitudine perspecta in formarum specie ac dignitate transitum est ad honestatem dictorum atque factorum. Familiares nostros, credo, Sironem dicis et Philodemum, cum optimos viros, tum homines doctissimos. Tum ille timide vel potius verecunde: Facio, inquit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Age nunc isti doceant, vel tu potius quis enim ista melius? Cuius quidem, quoniam Stoicus fuit, sententia condemnata mihi videtur esse inanitas ista verborum. Fortasse id optimum, sed ubi illud: Plus semper voluptatis? Sed tamen est aliquid, quod nobis non liceat, liceat illis. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Nulla erit controversia. Non igitur de improbo, sed de callido improbo quaerimus, qualis Q. Ea, quae dialectici nunc tradunt et docent, nonne ab illis instituta sunt aut inventa sunt? Quod mihi quidem visus est, cum sciret, velle tamen confitentem audire Torquatum. Ita relinquet duas, de quibus etiam atque etiam consideret.
Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Atque his de rebus et splendida est eorum et illustris oratio. Nemo nostrum istius generis asotos iucunde putat vivere. Idemne potest esse dies saepius, qui semel fuit? Nam Metrodorum non puto ipsum professum, sed, cum appellaretur ab Epicuro, repudiare tantum beneficium noluisse; Istam voluptatem perpetuam quis potest praestare sapienti? Graecis hoc modicum est: Leonidas, Epaminondas, tres aliqui aut quattuor;
The main limitation of this model is when it is applied as a binary choice when in reality there is an interplay and overlap between the approaches. In addition, some might argue that even though some people appear to be Gardeners, they actually have an implicit sense of planning that is not being stated or so consciously surfaced.
George R.R. Martin as a Gardener.
Martin points out that he leans more towards being a gardener, and describes how he started writing Game of Thrones having imagined a scene of a family finding wolves. He had a broad idea of the setting but effectively had to define it as he wrote, only creating the map when he was quite far into the story.
This fascinating Twitter thread by academic Daniel Silvermint argues that the failure of the final season of Game of Thrones was because Martin was a Gardener, yet the show writers had to write the final season without his text and relied on an Architect approach to draw the story to a conclusion.
J.K. Rowling as an architect.
Rowling used what has become known as a ‘story grid’ to plot out her stories. The following is part of her outline for Order of the Phoenix.
d
This concept is from George R.R. Martin’s description of writing approaches which he outlines in this quote:
“I think there are two types of writers, the architects and the gardeners. The architects plan everything ahead of time, like an architect building a house. They know how many rooms are going to be in the house, what kind of roof they're going to have, where the wires are going to run, what kind of plumbing there's going to be. They have the whole thing designed and blueprinted out before they even nail the first board up. The gardeners dig a hole, drop in a seed and water it. They kind of know what seed it is, they know if planted a fantasy seed or mystery seed or whatever. But as the plant comes up and they water it, they don't know how many branches it's going to have, they find out as it grows. And I'm much more a gardener than an architect.”
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”