When applied broadly, an understanding of Entropy and The Second Law of Thermodynamics helps explain the passa ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit; Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. De quibus cupio scire quid sentias. Mihi quidem Antiochum, quem audis, satis belle videris attendere. Atqui haec patefactio quasi rerum opertarum, cum quid quidque sit aperitur, definitio est. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quod idem cum vestri faciant, non satis magnam tribuunt inventoribus gratiam. Immo istud quidem, inquam, quo loco quidque, nisi iniquum postulo, arbitratu meo. Videamus animi partes, quarum est conspectus illustrior;
Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? Naturales divitias dixit parabiles esse, quod parvo esset natura contenta. Haec para/doca illi, nos admirabilia dicamus. An vero, inquit, quisquam potest probare, quod perceptfum, quod. Sit hoc ultimum bonorum, quod nunc a me defenditur; Ego quoque, inquit, didicerim libentius si quid attuleris, quam te reprehenderim.
Quasi vero, inquit, perpetua oratio rhetorum solum, non etiam philosophorum sit. Odium autem et invidiam facile vitabis. Tertium autem omnibus aut maximis rebus iis, quae secundum naturam sint, fruentem vivere. Tum ille timide vel potius verecunde: Facio, inquit.
- View everything as organised energy, that is decaying and dispersing.
Viewing ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Non enim iam stirpis bonum quaeret, sed animalis. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc etsi multimodis reprehendi potest, tamen accipio, quod dant. Quae quidem sapientes sequuntur duce natura tamquam videntes; Tamen a proposito, inquam, aberramus. Non quaeritur autem quid naturae tuae consentaneum sit, sed quid disciplinae.
An, partus ancillae sitne in fructu habendus, disseretur inter principes civitatis, P. Quonam, inquit, modo? Itaque nostrum est-quod nostrum dico, artis est-ad ea principia, quae accepimus. Neminem videbis ita laudatum, ut artifex callidus comparandarum voluptatum diceretur. Cum audissem Antiochum, Brute, ut solebam, cum M. Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Ut optime, secundum naturam affectum esse possit. Sit sane ista voluptas.
Octavio fuit, cum illam severitatem in eo filio adhibuit, quem in adoptionem D. Ex rebus enim timiditas, non ex vocabulis nascitur. Sed haec omittamus;
From a scientific point of view, there are some supposed challenges to The Second Law from quantum physics — but to be honest, we still don’t understand those challenges and the associated ongoing debate, which you can explore more in this 2017 Scientific American article.
In truth, we find a more interesting exploration of limitations via how you might use these models as a guide in your broader work and life. From that perspective, you might consider how the application of this model assumes that things decay, rather than change. That is, when applied to businesses, products, or relationships, rather than assuming decay, it might be more useful to assume change — that those elements will continue to evolve and shift which might or might not result in greater disorder. Though the pull towards disorder is still a compelling explanation for countless situations.
The steam engine.
It’s no coincidence that The Laws of Thermodynamics arose during the Industrial Revolution and the birth of the steam engine. The steam engine, at a basic level, has three components — a hot energy source (steam); a device that converts that heat energy into movement (pistons); and a vent that extracts energy that hasn’t been used as heat (a cold sink).
The need for the cold sink demonstrated that when heat was converted to movement, some of the heat was transferred into the system’s surroundings. This was an indicator that for energy to move from a high-temperature body to a low body one that work, or additional energy, was required.
The ice swan.
Imagine an ice sculpture of a swan sitting in an ocean. The sculpture might have incredible detail and artistry, meanwhile, the water around it has undefinable depths. Which do you think has more Entropy?
If you answered with the ocean, you’d be right. The ice sculpture is an ordered and defined object in comparison to the dispersed, random, and dare we say ‘disordered’ state of the water molecules in the ocean. The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that, without intervention, there is a greater probability that water molecules will organise themselves in the form of an ocean than that of an ice sculpted swan as a result.
Your bedroom.
A common analogy to explain Entropy is that of your messy bedroom. There are more ways your bedroom can be messy, than ways it could be clean and ordered. In that sense, your messy bedroom has high Entropy, and the Second Law would imply that it will tend towards that state if left unchecked.
,
As described in the In Practice section, the field of Thermodynamics was born from the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the steam engine. As with all such ideas, there were many contributors to the field, but French physicist Sadi Carnot was certainly seen as one of the leading thinkers in the space. His discussion of ‘thermodynamic efficiency’ was far ahead of its time.
Rudolf Clausius, working independently in the early 1850s, posited similar ideas after examining how heat from a heated body would flow to one of a lower temperature. He laid the groundwork for the Second Law by explaining: “heat does not pass from a body at low temperature to one at high temperature without an accompanying change elsewhere.”
The origins of these models are generally attributed to Clausius, though it could be rightly argued that Carnot had just as much, if not more, right to claim the mantle.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”