How do you choose which products or features to ship and which should remain in your backlog? RICE Scores are one way of making a call.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Graecis hoc modicum est: Leonidas, Epaminondas, tres aliqui aut quattuor; Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Quodsi ipsam honestatem undique pertectam atque absolutam.Id mihi magnum videtur. Ea, quae dialectici nunc tradunt et docent, nonne ab illis instituta sunt aut inventa sunt? Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Nisi autem rerum natura perspecta erit, nullo modo poterimus sensuum iudicia defendere. Illud quaero, quid ei, qui in voluptate summum bonum ponat, consentaneum sit dicere. Aliis esse maiora, illud dubium, ad id, quod summum bonum dicitis, ecquaenam possit fieri accessio. Atqui eorum nihil est eius generis, ut sit in fine atque extrerno bonorum. Quamquam non negatis nos intellegere quid sit voluptas, sed quid ille dicat.
Ita ne hoc quidem modo paria peccata sunt. Negat esse eam, inquit, propter se expetendam. Quodsi vultum tibi, si incessum fingeres, quo gravior viderere, non esses tui similis; Ex quo intellegitur officium medium quiddam esse, quod neque in bonis ponatur neque in contrariis. Apud imperitos tum illa dicta sunt, aliquid etiam coronae datum; Stulti autem malorum memoria torquentur, sapientes bona praeterita grata recordatione renovata delectant. Sic exclusis sententiis reliquorum cum praeterea nulla esse possit, haec antiquorum valeat necesse est. Ita ne hoc quidem modo paria peccata sunt. Praeclare hoc quidem.
- Identify the product or feature under consideration.
This might be part of a backlog or from a bra ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut nemo dubitet, eorum omnia officia quo spectare, quid sequi, quid fugere debeant? Hic, qui utrumque probat, ambobus debuit uti, sicut facit re, neque tamen dividit verbis. Cur igitur, cum de re conveniat, non malumus usitate loqui? Atqui iste locus est, Piso, tibi etiam atque etiam confirmandus, inquam; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ergo adhuc, quantum equidem intellego, causa non videtur fuisse mutandi nominis.
Quid ad utilitatem tantae pecuniae? Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Quamquam te quidem video minime esse deterritum. At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. An me, inquam, nisi te audire vellem, censes haec dicturum fuisse? Ex rebus enim timiditas, non ex vocabulis nascitur. Quoniam, si dis placet, ab Epicuro loqui discimus. Quid ergo aliud intellegetur nisi uti ne quae pars naturae neglegatur? Quod equidem non reprehendo; Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum. Egone quaeris, inquit, quid sentiam? Id enim volumus, id contendimus, ut officii fructus sit ipsum officium.
Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti. Cum audissem Antiochum, Brute, ut solebam, cum M. Quo plebiscito decreta a senatu est consuli quaestio Cn. Ad eos igitur converte te, quaeso. Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Et quidem saepe quaerimus verbum Latinum par Graeco et quod idem valeat; An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio.
The elements behind RICE are still subjective and potentially influenced by biases, though the ‘confidence’ factor is a positive inclusion in this respect.
The ‘effort’ factor does not consider different values of people hours so, for example, there is no distinction between 1 week of senior developer time which might cost twice as much as 1 week of a junior designer.
Intercom.
The RICE Score was first developed by Intercom as a way to develop product priorities and their original post included this link to a spreadsheet example to establish RICE scores.
RICE scores are typically used by product managers to help prioritise products and product features, similar to the impact effort matrix or kano.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave RICE score into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Impact effort matrix and kano are alternative prioritisation methods.
- Pareto principle: in establishing the ‘20’ features to deliver the ‘80’ value.
Complementary models:
- Golden circle: to ensure that new products and features are aligned with a deeper direction.
- Lock-in effect: as a potential consideration in relation to impact.Agile methodology: an iterative approach that works well with this form of prioritisation.
- Personas: as a potential tool to explore and establish reach and impact.
- Zawinski’s law: a warning to prioritise and avoid product bloat.
- Agile methodology: an iterative approach typically requiring fast and ongoing prioritisation.
- Minimum viable product: as an approach to cut out unnecessary features in the first instance.
The RICE Scoring model was developed by Intercom and is outlined in some detail in their original post about it here.
-
1490 days ago Shai Desai , Co-founder of ModelThinkers.com and Learning PlanI wasn’t familiar with this model but can immediately see its use in prioritising and making better decisions!
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”