0 saved
12K views
"Day 2 is stasis, followed by irrelevance, followed by excruciating painful decline, followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1 ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Iam in altera philosophiae parte. Incommoda autem et commoda-ita enim estmata et dustmata appello-communia esse voluerunt, paria noluerunt. Aliam vero vim voluptatis esse, aliam nihil dolendi, nisi valde pertinax fueris, concedas necesse est. Quod equidem non reprehendo; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc est dicere: Non reprehenderem asotos, si non essent asoti. Illum mallem levares, quo optimum atque humanissimum virum, Cn. Videsne quam sit magna dissensio? Nihil acciderat ei, quod nollet, nisi quod anulum, quo delectabatur, in mari abiecerat. Dulce amarum, leve asperum, prope longe, stare movere, quadratum rotundum. Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re; Quid enim mihi potest esse optatius quam cum Catone, omnium virtutum auctore, de virtutibus disputare? Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis; Quorum sine causa fieri nihil putandum est. An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Non igitur de improbo, sed de callido improbo quaerimus, qualis Q.
- Choose a bias to action with reversible decisions.
Ask ‘what are the consequences of this de ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Amicitiam autem adhibendam esse censent, quia sit ex eo genere, quae prosunt. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Sed emolumenta communia esse dicuntur, recte autem facta et peccata non habentur communia. Quid igitur, inquit, eos responsuros putas? Itaque hoc frequenter dici solet a vobis, non intellegere nos, quam dicat Epicurus voluptatem. Facit enim ille duo seiuncta ultima bonorum, quae ut essent vera, coniungi debuerunt;
Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Contineo me ab exemplis. Sed quoniam et advesperascit et mihi ad villam revertendum est, nunc quidem hactenus; Quare, quoniam de primis naturae commodis satis dietum est nunc de maioribus consequentibusque videamus. Deque his rebus satis multa in nostris de re publica libris sunt dicta a Laelio. Illud mihi a te nimium festinanter dictum videtur, sapientis omnis esse semper beatos; Is es profecto tu. Quod mihi quidem visus est, cum sciret, velle tamen confitentem audire Torquatum.
Sed tamen omne, quod de re bona dilucide dicitur, mihi praeclare dici videtur. At multis malis affectus. At multis malis affectus. Hoc est vim afferre, Torquate, sensibus, extorquere ex animis cognitiones verborum, quibus inbuti sumus. Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Rhetorice igitur, inquam, nos mavis quam dialectice disputare? Egone quaeris, inquit, quid sentiam? Sed nunc, quod agimus; Negat enim summo bono afferre incrementum diem. Similiter sensus, cum accessit ad naturam, tuetur illam quidem, sed etiam se tuetur;
Even reversible decisions have an Opportunity Cost. The time and effort invested in that choice and then possibly backtracking have a cost in relation to the option forgone.
At the same time, the examples provided by Bezos ‘using his gut’ and intuition are problematic when we consider behavioural economics, Fast and Slow Thinking, and unconscious bias.
It's true that experts have deep, often unconscious pattern recognition within their field of expertise so can often make reliable, fast, gut-based decisions. But it's also true that such gut reactions lack a rational consideration and are prone to be impacted on by countless heuristics, particularly in new and unfamiliar situations.
Greenlighting Amazon Prime.
Bezos has said that the decision to greenlight Amazon Prime was ultimately based on intuition because the data did not provide a clear way forward. He explains that this is a common challenge with a new, untested initiative.
Bezos said: “There wasn’t a single financially savvy person who supported the decision to launch Amazon Prime. Zero. Every spreadsheet showed that it was going to be a disaster. So that had to just be made with gut.”
“You collect as much data as you can. You immerse yourself in that data,” said Bezos, “but then make the decision with your heart.”
The high velocity decision model is a useful decision making framework for any individual or team wanting to increase their agility and work in a competitive environment.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave high velocity decisions into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Agile methodology: sharing the ideas of having a bias to action and testing ideas.
- Lean startup and minimum viable product: again, embracing the idea of quickly testing assumptions rather than discussing them forever.
Complementary models:
- Second order thinking: even if it is reversible, will the decision have second order and beyond implications that are irreversible?
- Circle of competence: making fast decisions from your circle of competence.
- Pareto principle: when making a decision based on 70 to 90% of the information, consider whether it includes the critical information.
- Inversion: considering what will be the cost of making the wrong decision in assessing whether it is reversible and what’s at stake.
- Redundancy/ margin of safety: to better make decisions with minimal risk.
- Fast and slow thinking: and the traps of relying on fast thinking.
- Availability heuristic: one of many cognitive biases that might arise from fast decision making.
- Prototypes: supporting a low risk approach to a bias for action.
This approach was described by Jeff Bezos in his 2016 letter to stakeholders. Here's how it starts:
“'Jeff, what does Day 2 look like?'
"That’s a question I just got at our most recent all-hands meeting. I’ve been reminding people that it’s Day 1 for a couple of decades. I work in an Amazon building named Day 1, and when I moved buildings, I took the name with me. I spend time thinking about this topic.
"'Day 2 is stasis. Followed by irrelevance. Followed by excruciating, painful decline. Followed by death. And that is why it is always Day 1.'
"To be sure, this kind of decline would happen in extreme slow motion. An established company might harvest Day 2 for decades, but the final result would still come.
"I’m interested in the question, how do you fend off Day 2? What are the techniques and tactics? How do you keep the vitality of Day 1, even inside a large organization?
"Such a question can’t have a simple answer. There will be many elements, multiple paths, and many traps. I don’t know the whole answer, but I may know bits of it. Here’s a starter pack of essentials for Day 1 defense: customer obsession, a skeptical view of proxies, the eager adoption of external trends, and high-velocity decision making."
The essence of the following 'starter pack' has been summarised into the High-Velocity Decisions model that you've been exploring.
My Notes
-
1367 days ago arun , CoFounder ModelThinkers & keynote speakerI was very proud that we managed to dig up this model. It's not widely talked about elsewhere, though there are many references about Bezos considering irreversible / reversible decisions, there aren't many sources that capture the 4 elements from the original shareholder letter. We really found the four elements in combination very powerful for any agile organistion.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.