0 saved
11.2K views
There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Earum etiam rerum, quas terra gignit, educatio quaedam et perfectio est non dissimilis animantium. Et hunc idem dico, inquieta sed ad virtutes et ad vitia nihil interesse. An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. At cum de plurimis eadem dicit, tum certe de maximis. Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego.
Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Quae qui non vident, nihil umquam magnum ac cognitione dignum amaverunt. Non enim ipsa genuit hominem, sed accepit a natura inchoatum. Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur. Ita graviter et severe voluptatem secrevit a bono. An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Et non ex maxima parte de tota iudicabis?
Nam quid possumus facere melius? Ille enim occurrentia nescio quae comminiscebatur; Ne in odium veniam, si amicum destitero tueri. Nam adhuc, meo fortasse vitio, quid ego quaeram non perspicis. Equidem etiam Epicurum, in physicis quidem, Democriteum puto. Bonum liberi: misera orbitas.
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? Aliter autem vobis placet. Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Nos quidem Virtutes sic natae sumus, ut tibi serviremus, aliud negotii nihil habemus. At iste non dolendi status non vocatur voluptas. Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur.
Occultum facinus esse potuerit, gaudebit; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Id enim natura desiderat. Atque haec ita iustitiae propria sunt, ut sint virtutum reliquarum communia. Si mala non sunt, iacet omnis ratio Peripateticorum.
Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Vestri haec verecundius, illi fortasse constantius. Nam diligi et carum esse iucundum est propterea, quia tutiorem vitam et voluptatem pleniorem efficit. Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Scio enim esse quosdam, qui quavis lingua philosophari possint; Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum. Ac ne plura complectar-sunt enim innumerabilia-, bene laudata virtus voluptatis aditus intercludat necesse est. Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Ut in voluptate sit, qui epuletur, in dolore, qui torqueatur. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro;
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.