Let's say I told you that joining ModelThinkers costs US$200. It doesn't — it actually costs US$60.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. De ingenio eius in his disputationibus, non de moribus quaeritur. A primo, ut opinor, animantium ortu petitur origo summi boni. Non pugnem cum homine, cur tantum habeat in natura boni; Eam stabilem appellas. Plane idem, inquit, et maxima quidem, qua fieri nulla maior potest. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. His singulis copiose responderi solet, sed quae perspicua sunt longa esse non debent.
Nam et a te perfici istam disputationem volo, nec tua mihi oratio longa videri potest. Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias? Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Tu autem inter haec tantam multitudinem hominum interiectam non vides nec laetantium nec dolentium? Aut haec tibi, Torquate, sunt vituperanda aut patrocinium voluptatis repudiandum. Perturbationes autem nulla naturae vi commoventur, omniaque ea sunt opiniones ac iudicia levitatis. Traditur, inquit, ab Epicuro ratio neglegendi doloris. Hinc ceteri particulas arripere conati suam quisque videro voluit afferre sententiam. Aliam vero vim voluptatis esse, aliam nihil dolendi, nisi valde pertinax fueris, concedas necesse est. Qua ex cognitione facilior facta est investigatio rerum occultissimarum.
Nullis enim partitionibus, nullis definitionibus utuntur ipsique dicunt ea se modo probare, quibus natura tacita adsentiatur. Deque his rebus satis multa in nostris de re publica libris sunt dicta a Laelio. Tanti autem aderant vesicae et torminum morbi, ut nihil ad eorum magnitudinem posset accedere. Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; An me, inquam, nisi te audire vellem, censes haec dicturum fuisse? At tu eadem ista dic in iudicio aut, si coronam times, dic in senatu. In ipsa enim parum magna vis inest, ut quam optime se habere possit, si nulla cultura adhibeatur. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse;
- Delay and set your own anchor to interrupt anchoring bias.
Anchoring can function as a cognitive b ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Si enim ad populum me vocas, eum. Si verbum sequimur, primum longius verbum praepositum quam bonum. Cur id non ita fit? Nihilo beatiorem esse Metellum quam Regulum. Conclusum est enim contra Cyrenaicos satis acute, nihil ad Epicurum.
Quod autem magnum dolorem brevem, longinquum levem esse dicitis, id non intellego quale sit. Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere. Quis est, qui non oderit libidinosam, protervam adolescentiam? Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. Restatis igitur vos; Ut enim consuetudo loquitur, id solum dicitur honestum, quod est populari fama gloriosum.
Itaque dicunt nec dubitant: mihi sic usus est, tibi ut opus est facto, fac. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P. Facit igitur Lucius noster prudenter, qui audire de summo bono potissimum velit;
The Anchoring Effect has been consistently replicated in a number of experiments and studies, with some variations. For example, there remains debate on the impacts of experience in a domain, and in the cognitive ability of participants — with studies in these areas returning mixed results.
That said, it is a largely accepted phenomenon.
Guess Gandhi's age.
In a 1997 experiment by Strack and Mussweiler, the two groups of participants to guess the age of Mahatma Gandhi when he died. Before the groups answered, they were anchored by preceding questions. The questions and results were as follows:
- Did Mahatma Gandhi die before or after the age of 9 years old? How old was he when he died? Average answer = 50 years.
- Did Mahatma Gandhi die before or after the age of 140 years old? How old was he when he died? Average answer = 67 years.
Anchoring in negotiations.
This excellent description by Harvard Law Professor Guhan Subramanian outlines his recommendations and experience in using and countering anchoring in negotiations. From defusing anchoring to justifying an offer that you want to become an anchor.
Anchoring and the law.
In one study, a prosecutor's extreme sentencing demand resulted in 27 to 60% longer prison sentences. Similarly, a journalist's question about sentencing resulted in 32% longer prison sentence. See this article for more examples in the legal context.
Anchoring and the breadmaker.
A company called Williams-Sonoma famously was struggling to sell there new bread maker which was priced at $279. Rather than change the product, or even lower the price, they did something surprising. They started selling a second breadmaker for $429. The result? Few people bought the expensive bread maker but the sales of the (now) cheaper one doubled. While it's hard to know the exact motivation here, it isn't a stretch to posit that the anchoring heuristic was at play — and the 'cheaper' bread maker suddenly seemed like a bargain.
The anchoring heuristic is a cognitive bias that has a range of implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the anchoring heuristic into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: to understand broader cognitive biases.
- Availability heuristic: initial information tends to be part of the ‘most available’ information, though availability is broader.
Complementary models:
- EAST framework: incorporate anchoring in nudging strategies.
- BATNA & ZOPA: incorporating anchoring into negotiations.
- RICE score: consider the impact of anchoring in estimates.
- 4Ps of marketing: using anchoring in pricing strategy.
The anchoring heuristic is also known as anchoring bias, the anchoring effect and the anchoring and adjustment heuristic.
The anchoring and adjustment heuristic was first identified by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1974. The ‘adjustment’ refers to the tendency for subsequent judgements to change based on the initial anchor. We have shortened this heuristics name to the more familiar ‘anchoring heuristic’. See their book Thinking, Fast and Slow for more.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”