Track the reasons behind challenges and problems in any domain using this hierarchy based tool — bonus, it looks like a fish, what’s no ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Habes, inquam, Cato, formam eorum, de quibus loquor, philosophorum. Nam illud quidem adduci vix possum, ut ea, quae senserit ille, tibi non vera videantur. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Ratio quidem vestra sic cogit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Quam tu ponis in verbis, ego positam in re putabam. Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Quibusnam praeteritis? Qui autem de summo bono dissentit de tota philosophiae ratione dissentit. Quicquid porro animo cernimus, id omne oritur a sensibus; Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. Et quod est munus, quod opus sapientiae? Unum nescio, quo modo possit, si luxuriosus sit, finitas cupiditates habere. Quae cum essent dicta, discessimus. Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest.
Atqui reperies, inquit, in hoc quidem pertinacem; Octavio fuit, cum illam severitatem in eo filio adhibuit, quem in adoptionem D. Neque enim disputari sine reprehensione nec cum iracundia aut pertinacia recte disputari potest. Quamquam tu hanc copiosiorem etiam soles dicere. Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? Si qua in iis corrigere voluit, deteriora fecit. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? At hoc in eo M.
- Identify the problem, or effect.
Define the problem or end effect that is being investigated and w ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Tollitur beneficium, tollitur gratia, quae sunt vincla concordiae. Egone quaeris, inquit, quid sentiam? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hoc dixerit potius Ennius: Nimium boni est, cui nihil est mali. Nos vero, inquit ille; Ergo adhuc, quantum equidem intellego, causa non videtur fuisse mutandi nominis.
Idemne, quod iucunde? At habetur! Et ego id scilicet nesciebam! Sed ut sit, etiamne post mortem coletur? Quae hic rei publicae vulnera inponebat, eadem ille sanabat. Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Nec tamen ullo modo summum pecudis bonum et hominis idem mihi videri potest. Ad eos igitur converte te, quaeso. Aut haec tibi, Torquate, sunt vituperanda aut patrocinium voluptatis repudiandum.
Sic enim maiores nostri labores non fugiendos tristissimo tamen verbo aerumnas etiam in deo nominaverunt. Paria sunt igitur. Vide, quantum, inquam, fallare, Torquate. Idemque diviserunt naturam hominis in animum et corpus. Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret? Si enim non fuit eorum iudicii, nihilo magis hoc non addito illud est iudicatum-. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Hoc enim identidem dicitis, non intellegere nos quam dicatis voluptatem.
The main issues with the diagram are the differentiation between causes and sub causes. For example, some causes might be complex, with many elements below them, becoming impractical to capture in the diagram. By breaking it up into separate categories, the diagram also does not lend itself to a more connected view of challenges.
Finally, there is no clear prioritisation within the diagram — all causes seem equal, when in reality a sub cause, which is visually small, might be the key issue. Other causes and sub causes therefore might become a distraction.
Internal damages at IKEA.
This paper from Ikea in Portugal describes a process improvement process to address the level of internal damages in Ikea stores. The diagram below was part of a broader analysis process.
The fishbone or Ishikawa diagram, also known as the cause-and-effect diagram, is a core tool within quality management and is commonly used for improvements in products, manufacturing and other fields.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the fishbone diagram into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- 5 Whys: in digging to root cause, use this as part of the fishbone process.
- Second order thinking: to go beyond the initial cause to sub causes.
- 4Ps of marketing: as possible categories.
Complementary models:
- Risk matrix: to consider potential issues with consequences versus likelihood.
- Chain reaction/ domino effect: to consider the flow on effects of potential issues.
- First principle thinking: to identify and go below assumptions.
- Occam’s razor: to cut to the core of the issue.
- Divide and conquer: separating out and addressing potential causes.
The Fishbone Diagram was created by quality management pioneer Professor Kaoru Ishikawa in 1968. Ishikawa, an engineer, was a leader of quality management at Kawasaki at the time. In his 1986 book, Guide to Quality Control, Ishikawa argued that there were six other key quality tools in addition to what he called the ‘cause-and-effect diagram’, which were: control chart, histogram, flow chart, run chart, scatter diagram and Pareto chart.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”