Track the reasons behind challenges and problems in any domain using this hierarchy based tool — bonus, it looks like a fish, what’s no ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Odium autem et invidiam facile vitabis. Egone non intellego, quid sit don Graece, Latine voluptas? Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Non quaero, quid dicat, sed quid convenienter possit rationi et sententiae suae dicere. Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Quid censes in Latino fore? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba.
Ex ea difficultate illae fallaciloquae, ut ait Accius, malitiae natae sunt. Equidem etiam Epicurum, in physicis quidem, Democriteum puto. Nos vero, inquit ille; Bona autem corporis huic sunt, quod posterius posui, similiora. Videamus animi partes, quarum est conspectus illustrior; Quae cum dixisset paulumque institisset, Quid est? Nam si beatus umquam fuisset, beatam vitam usque ad illum a Cyro extructum rogum pertulisset.
Causa autem fuit huc veniendi ut quosdam hinc libros promerem. Quem Tiberina descensio festo illo die tanto gaudio affecit, quanto L. Rationis enim perfectio est virtus; Scaevolam M. Nunc ita separantur, ut disiuncta sint, quo nihil potest esse perversius. Quid igitur dubitamus in tota eius natura quaerere quid sit effectum? Hos contra singulos dici est melius. Ille enim occurrentia nescio quae comminiscebatur; Hanc se tuus Epicurus omnino ignorare dicit quam aut qualem esse velint qui honestate summum bonum metiantur. Superiores tres erant, quae esse possent, quarum est una sola defensa, eaque vehementer.
- Identify the problem, or effect.
Define the problem or end effect that is being investigated and w ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Age nunc isti doceant, vel tu potius quis enim ista melius? Isto modo, ne si avia quidem eius nata non esset. Audeo dicere, inquit. Sunt enim prima elementa naturae, quibus auctis vírtutis quasi germen efficitur. Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici.
An est aliquid per se ipsum flagitiosum, etiamsi nulla comitetur infamia? Ergo illi intellegunt quid Epicurus dicat, ego non intellego? Iam in altera philosophiae parte. Quare conare, quaeso. Mihi enim satis est, ipsis non satis. Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur? Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint. Ut in geometria, prima si dederis, danda sunt omnia. Satisne ergo pudori consulat, si quis sine teste libidini pareat? Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio.
Cui Tubuli nomen odio non est? Ergo ita: non posse honeste vivi, nisi honeste vivatur? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Saepe ab Aristotele, a Theophrasto mirabiliter est laudata per se ipsa rerum scientia; Praeteritis, inquit, gaudeo. An me, inquis, tam amentem putas, ut apud imperitos isto modo loquar? Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Illis videtur, qui illud non dubitant bonum dicere -;
The main issues with the diagram are the differentiation between causes and sub causes. For example, some causes might be complex, with many elements below them, becoming impractical to capture in the diagram. By breaking it up into separate categories, the diagram also does not lend itself to a more connected view of challenges.
Finally, there is no clear prioritisation within the diagram — all causes seem equal, when in reality a sub cause, which is visually small, might be the key issue. Other causes and sub causes therefore might become a distraction.
Internal damages at IKEA.
This paper from Ikea in Portugal describes a process improvement process to address the level of internal damages in Ikea stores. The diagram below was part of a broader analysis process.
The fishbone or Ishikawa diagram, also known as the cause-and-effect diagram, is a core tool within quality management and is commonly used for improvements in products, manufacturing and other fields.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the fishbone diagram into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- 5 Whys: in digging to root cause, use this as part of the fishbone process.
- Second order thinking: to go beyond the initial cause to sub causes.
- 4Ps of marketing: as possible categories.
Complementary models:
- Risk matrix: to consider potential issues with consequences versus likelihood.
- Chain reaction/ domino effect: to consider the flow on effects of potential issues.
- First principle thinking: to identify and go below assumptions.
- Occam’s razor: to cut to the core of the issue.
- Divide and conquer: separating out and addressing potential causes.
The Fishbone Diagram was created by quality management pioneer Professor Kaoru Ishikawa in 1968. Ishikawa, an engineer, was a leader of quality management at Kawasaki at the time. In his 1986 book, Guide to Quality Control, Ishikawa argued that there were six other key quality tools in addition to what he called the ‘cause-and-effect diagram’, which were: control chart, histogram, flow chart, run chart, scatter diagram and Pareto chart.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”