0 saved
11.4K views
A popular model in risk management across domains as diverse as aerospace, healthcare, mining, and manufacturing, the Swiss Cheese Mo ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. An tu me de L. In motu et in statu corporis nihil inest, quod animadvertendum esse ipsa natura iudicet? Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Deinde prima illa, quae in congressu solemus: Quid tu, inquit, huc? Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere? Idemne potest esse dies saepius, qui semel fuit? Sint modo partes vitae beatae. Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. Conclusum est enim contra Cyrenaicos satis acute, nihil ad Epicurum. Hoc est vim afferre, Torquate, sensibus, extorquere ex animis cognitiones verborum, quibus inbuti sumus. Deque his rebus satis multa in nostris de re publica libris sunt dicta a Laelio. At miser, si in flagitiosa et vitiosa vita afflueret voluptatibus. Ergo in utroque exercebantur, eaque disciplina effecit tantam illorum utroque in genere dicendi copiam. Post enim Chrysippum eum non sane est disputatum. Amicitiam autem adhibendam esse censent, quia sit ex eo genere, quae prosunt. Transfer idem ad modestiam vel temperantiam, quae est moderatio cupiditatum rationi oboediens. Aliter enim nosmet ipsos nosse non possumus. Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere. Hosne igitur laudas et hanc eorum, inquam, sententiam sequi nos censes oportere? Quid enim necesse est, tamquam meretricem in matronarum coetum, sic voluptatem in virtutum concilium adducere?
- Assume that human error will occur.
Reason’s work was premised on the id ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles? Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus. At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Istam voluptatem, inquit, Epicurus ignorat? Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim.
Sin kakan malitiam dixisses, ad aliud nos unum certum vitium consuetudo Latina traduceret. Nam nec vir bonus ac iustus haberi debet qui, ne malum habeat, abstinet se ab iniuria. In schola desinis. Summum ením bonum exposuit vacuitatem doloris; Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia.
Omnes enim iucundum motum, quo sensus hilaretur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Immo videri fortasse.
The metaphor of Swiss Cheese has clearly resonated in safety and accident domains, though criticism has persisted. One of the prime criticisms is the simplistic nature of the metaphor that leaves it too generic and without value. Many point to the fact that Reason himself tried to expand his work with subsequent diagrams and papers which have not persisted like the Swiss Cheese Model. At worst, it's seen as a reductionist approach that was born from his period working as a consultant, at best it's seen as a tool he used to communicate important concepts, albeit relatively superficially, to management.
For example, some would argue the metaphor presents accidents as a linear occurrence, while in reality, they occur in dynamic and non-linear ways. This links to a broader criticism that it lacks a systems and dynamic view of problems, implying that each component, like a slice of cheese, can be altered and even fixed in isolation.
Another issue with the original diagram is how it continues to be interpreted so differently by practitioners. While some would argue that its broad definition allows for diverse agreement and application, others point to studies of practitioners who were revealed to have different understandings of what the model represents and what it means as a result.
Covid.
Below is Australian Virologist Ian Mackay’s repurposed version of the Swiss Cheese Model as it was applied to Covid mitigation.
Risk consultant Julian Talbot used this model to explain the devastation of the 2009 Australian bushfires in the diagram below.
Engineering.
Michigan Tech used this diagram to explore the safety elements in engineering, including a mitigation layer on the end.
d
According to James Reason, his inspiration for this model came in the 1970s while he was making tea. He was distracted by his large insistent cat and absent-mindedly dolloped a large spoonful of cat food into the teapot. Reason was fascinated by the similarities of the tasks that led to his mistake and this deepened his research that culminated into his book A Life in Errors - From Little Slips to Big Disasters. He particularly was interested in the impact of mistakes with human-machine interaction, particularly in the high-stakes fields such as aerospace to nuclear power.
Others have noted that Reason had input from John Wreathall in developing what was essentially a building on traditional safety management thinking with an understanding of human error. Reason published the original work behind this model in 1990, then explored it more explicitly in the British medical journal in 2000, though it was several years before it was developed as the organisational accident model, and later known as the Swiss Cheese Model.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.