0 saved
11.2K views
A popular model in risk management across domains as diverse as aerospace, healthcare, mining, and manufacturing, the Swiss Cheese Mo ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae diligentissime contra Aristonem dicuntur a Chryippo. Te ipsum, dignissimum maioribus tuis, voluptasne induxit, ut adolescentulus eriperes P. Tu vero, inquam, ducas licet, si sequetur; Omnium enim rerum principia parva sunt, sed suis progressionibus usa augentur nec sine causa; Quae similitudo in genere etiam humano apparet. Quo modo autem philosophus loquitur? Ergo hoc quidem apparet, nos ad agendum esse natos. An eiusdem modi? Hoc est vim afferre, Torquate, sensibus, extorquere ex animis cognitiones verborum, quibus inbuti sumus. Sed ea mala virtuti magnitudine obruebantur. Summus dolor plures dies manere non potest? Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Potius inflammat, ut coercendi magis quam dedocendi esse videantur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Modo etiam paulum ad dexteram de via declinavi, ut ad Pericli sepulcrum accederem. Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Ita graviter et severe voluptatem secrevit a bono. Sed quia studebat laudi et dignitati, multum in virtute processerat.
- Assume that human error will occur.
Reason’s work was premised on the id ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ad eos igitur converte te, quaeso. Quid igitur, inquit, eos responsuros putas? Quae quidem vel cum periculo est quaerenda vobis; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Etsi ea quidem, quae adhuc dixisti, quamvis ad aetatem recte isto modo dicerentur.
Sed videbimus. Ille enim occurrentia nescio quae comminiscebatur; Hoc est dicere: Non reprehenderem asotos, si non essent asoti. Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Quae tamen a te agetur non melior, quam illae sunt, quas interdum optines. Vide, quantum, inquam, fallare, Torquate.
Vos autem cum perspicuis dubia debeatis illustrare, dubiis perspicua conamini tollere. Primum quid tu dicis breve? Ita credo. Naturales divitias dixit parabiles esse, quod parvo esset natura contenta. Si longus, levis. Quid, quod homines infima fortuna, nulla spe rerum gerendarum, opifices denique delectantur historia? Ergo, si semel tristior effectus est, hilara vita amissa est? Apud imperitos tum illa dicta sunt, aliquid etiam coronae datum; Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti. Nihil opus est exemplis hoc facere longius.
The metaphor of Swiss Cheese has clearly resonated in safety and accident domains, though criticism has persisted. One of the prime criticisms is the simplistic nature of the metaphor that leaves it too generic and without value. Many point to the fact that Reason himself tried to expand his work with subsequent diagrams and papers which have not persisted like the Swiss Cheese Model. At worst, it's seen as a reductionist approach that was born from his period working as a consultant, at best it's seen as a tool he used to communicate important concepts, albeit relatively superficially, to management.
For example, some would argue the metaphor presents accidents as a linear occurrence, while in reality, they occur in dynamic and non-linear ways. This links to a broader criticism that it lacks a systems and dynamic view of problems, implying that each component, like a slice of cheese, can be altered and even fixed in isolation.
Another issue with the original diagram is how it continues to be interpreted so differently by practitioners. While some would argue that its broad definition allows for diverse agreement and application, others point to studies of practitioners who were revealed to have different understandings of what the model represents and what it means as a result.
Covid.
Below is Australian Virologist Ian Mackay’s repurposed version of the Swiss Cheese Model as it was applied to Covid mitigation.
Risk consultant Julian Talbot used this model to explain the devastation of the 2009 Australian bushfires in the diagram below.
Engineering.
Michigan Tech used this diagram to explore the safety elements in engineering, including a mitigation layer on the end.
d
According to James Reason, his inspiration for this model came in the 1970s while he was making tea. He was distracted by his large insistent cat and absent-mindedly dolloped a large spoonful of cat food into the teapot. Reason was fascinated by the similarities of the tasks that led to his mistake and this deepened his research that culminated into his book A Life in Errors - From Little Slips to Big Disasters. He particularly was interested in the impact of mistakes with human-machine interaction, particularly in the high-stakes fields such as aerospace to nuclear power.
Others have noted that Reason had input from John Wreathall in developing what was essentially a building on traditional safety management thinking with an understanding of human error. Reason published the original work behind this model in 1990, then explored it more explicitly in the British medical journal in 2000, though it was several years before it was developed as the organisational accident model, and later known as the Swiss Cheese Model.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.