0 saved
11K views
A popular model in risk management across domains as diverse as aerospace, healthcare, mining, and manufacturing, the Swiss Cheese Mo ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Haeret in salebra. Quacumque enim ingredimur, in aliqua historia vestigium ponimus. Collige omnia, quae soletis: Praesidium amicorum. Et ais, si una littera commota sit, fore tota ut labet disciplina. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Non enim, si malum est dolor, carere eo malo satis est ad bene vivendum. Illum mallem levares, quo optimum atque humanissimum virum, Cn. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Nam illud vehementer repugnat, eundem beatum esse et multis malis oppressum. Ergo hoc quidem apparet, nos ad agendum esse natos. Conclusum est enim contra Cyrenaicos satis acute, nihil ad Epicurum. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. At tu eadem ista dic in iudicio aut, si coronam times, dic in senatu. Ergo instituto veterum, quo etiam Stoici utuntur, hinc capiamus exordium. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret?
- Assume that human error will occur.
Reason’s work was premised on the id ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Quonam, inquit, modo? Aliter enim nosmet ipsos nosse non possumus. Si enim ad populum me vocas, eum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint.
Illud dico, ea, quae dicat, praeclare inter se cohaerere. ALIO MODO. Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis. Nulla profecto est, quin suam vim retineat a primo ad extremum. Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio.
Nummus in Croesi divitiis obscuratur, pars est tamen divitiarum. Quid, cum fictas fabulas, e quibus utilitas nulla elici potest, cum voluptate legimus? An, partus ancillae sitne in fructu habendus, disseretur inter principes civitatis, P. Quae iam oratio non a philosopho aliquo, sed a censore opprimenda est. Itaque hic ipse iam pridem est reiectus; Profectus in exilium Tubulus statim nec respondere ausus;
The metaphor of Swiss Cheese has clearly resonated in safety and accident domains, though criticism has persisted. One of the prime criticisms is the simplistic nature of the metaphor that leaves it too generic and without value. Many point to the fact that Reason himself tried to expand his work with subsequent diagrams and papers which have not persisted like the Swiss Cheese Model. At worst, it's seen as a reductionist approach that was born from his period working as a consultant, at best it's seen as a tool he used to communicate important concepts, albeit relatively superficially, to management.
For example, some would argue the metaphor presents accidents as a linear occurrence, while in reality, they occur in dynamic and non-linear ways. This links to a broader criticism that it lacks a systems and dynamic view of problems, implying that each component, like a slice of cheese, can be altered and even fixed in isolation.
Another issue with the original diagram is how it continues to be interpreted so differently by practitioners. While some would argue that its broad definition allows for diverse agreement and application, others point to studies of practitioners who were revealed to have different understandings of what the model represents and what it means as a result.
Covid.
Below is Australian Virologist Ian Mackay’s repurposed version of the Swiss Cheese Model as it was applied to Covid mitigation.
Risk consultant Julian Talbot used this model to explain the devastation of the 2009 Australian bushfires in the diagram below.
Engineering.
Michigan Tech used this diagram to explore the safety elements in engineering, including a mitigation layer on the end.
d
According to James Reason, his inspiration for this model came in the 1970s while he was making tea. He was distracted by his large insistent cat and absent-mindedly dolloped a large spoonful of cat food into the teapot. Reason was fascinated by the similarities of the tasks that led to his mistake and this deepened his research that culminated into his book A Life in Errors - From Little Slips to Big Disasters. He particularly was interested in the impact of mistakes with human-machine interaction, particularly in the high-stakes fields such as aerospace to nuclear power.
Others have noted that Reason had input from John Wreathall in developing what was essentially a building on traditional safety management thinking with an understanding of human error. Reason published the original work behind this model in 1990, then explored it more explicitly in the British medical journal in 2000, though it was several years before it was developed as the organisational accident model, and later known as the Swiss Cheese Model.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.