Save to My Latticework unsave

Aristotle's Rhetoric
Aristotle's Rhetoric
Aristotle's Rhetoric
save0 saved view18.4K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

This model from Ancient Greece has helped define the art of persuasion for over 2,000 years and continues to serve as a guide for impactf ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quasi vero, inquit, perpetua oratio rhetorum solum, non etiam philosophorum sit. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Qui potest igitur habitare in beata vita summi mali metus? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quam tu ponis in verbis, ego positam in re putabam. Itaque vides, quo modo loquantur, nova verba fingunt, deserunt usitata. Immo vero, inquit, ad beatissime vivendum parum est, ad beate vero satis. Quis non odit sordidos, vanos, leves, futtiles?

Nam, ut sint illa vendibiliora, haec uberiora certe sunt. Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi. Igitur ne dolorem quidem. Progredientibus autem aetatibus sensim tardeve potius quasi nosmet ipsos cognoscimus. Sed haec ab Antiocho, familiari nostro, dicuntur multo melius et fortius, quam a Stasea dicebantur. An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Haec et tu ita posuisti, et verba vestra sunt.

Quae cum essent dicta, discessimus. Huius, Lyco, oratione locuples, rebus ipsis ielunior. Quae si potest singula consolando levare, universa quo modo sustinebit? Quam illa ardentis amores excitaret sui! Cur tandem? At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Utinam quidem dicerent alium alio beatiorem! Iam ruinas videres. Summum a vobis bonum voluptas dicitur. Inquit, dasne adolescenti veniam? An dolor longissimus quisque miserrimus, voluptatem non optabiliorem diuturnitas facit?

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Deeply understand your audience. 

What are their current ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit. Illud non continuo, ut aeque incontentae. In qua quid est boni praeter summam voluptatem, et eam sempiternam? Tuo vero id quidem, inquam, arbitratu. Age, inquies, ista parva sunt. Refert tamen, quo modo.

Nobis Heracleotes ille Dionysius flagitiose descivisse videtur a Stoicis propter oculorum dolorem. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. At enim sequor utilitatem. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Nondum autem explanatum satis, erat, quid maxime natura vellet. Negat enim summo bono afferre incrementum diem. Eaedem enim utilitates poterunt eas labefactare atque pervertere.

Servari enim iustitia nisi a forti viro, nisi a sapiente non potest. Equidem etiam Epicurum, in physicis quidem, Democriteum puto. Scaevolam M. Quid enim possumus hoc agere divinius? Ergo ita: non posse honeste vivi, nisi honeste vivatur? Et non ex maxima parte de tota iudicabis? Urgent tamen et nihil remittunt. Sed utrum hortandus es nobis, Luci, inquit, an etiam tua sponte propensus es? Et si turpitudinem fugimus in statu et motu corporis, quid est cur pulchritudinem non sequamur?

Limitations

Plato, Aristotle’s teacher, was critical of persuasion techniques, seemingly to rally against the form and emotional element winning arguments over a logical case as an example of manipulation. Aristotle did counter this, suggesting that the art of persuasion was a necessary but neutral tool and that it should be used ethically. 

Other criticism of the model tends to be in its application, as it sets a broad framework but potentially lacks more practical application. In other words, while a useful guide, the model still takes considerable skill to apply effectively and consistently. 

In Practice

Legal application. 

This 2014 research paper describes how Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle is a crucial tool in the courtroom. The author explains: 

“Logos, ethos, and pathos, a persuader’s logical, credibility-related, and emotional appeals, when used in concert, create a whole argument. This argument is one which takes into account the human element as well as the rational and logical needs of the law in its pursuit of justice. Classical Aristotelian rhetoric, thus, must not be dismissed by the advocate hoping to most effectively represent his client. Nor should it be dismissed by the legal community as form over substance.As I have demonstrated, the end result of an attorney utilizing Aristotle’s three modes together is the fairest result possible in a given situation, so substance is not sacrificed, and effective form is still maintained.”

“I have a dream.” 

I could have chosen an analysis of any modern speech based on Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, I went with Martin Luthor King’s classic. 

This article breaks it down, including noting the following: 

Ethos

  • By way of establishing his intentions, “In his speech, King frequently looks back at moments in American history and refers to the leaders who laid the foundation of free America.” 

Pathos

  • Given the moment of anger and frustration he was speaking in, there’s no wonder that Pathos was a main ingredient. “His speech keeps growing more dramatic and engaging. King tries to make the frustration visible that years of neglect have caused.” 

Logos

  • King paints the future state, the ‘dream’, and lays out a path to achieve it, heavily referencing American history. 

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

m

Origins & Resources

Aristotle’s Rhetoric was set out in his book On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse. I say 'book' because it has been published as such but, like his other works, seems to have been a collection of his student’s notes in response to his lectures. His body of work on persuasion did progress and shift over his life, though these three appeals remained consistent. 

Other modern sources to dive into this model include the work of Carmine Gallo, see his HBR article on the topic; and Sam Leith’s Words Like Loaded Pistols. For a more in-depth albeit slightly academic view of this model, you can also visit the entry in Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy.    

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.