0 saved
9.1K views
One of the most popular models in game theory, the prisoner’s dilemma represents a compelling story with a range of takeaways.
< ...Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. An est aliquid, quod te sua sponte delectet? At enim hic etiam dolore. Quid de Platone aut de Democrito loquar? Idem etiam dolorem saepe perpetiuntur, ne, si id non faciant, incidant in maiorem.
Illa sunt similia: hebes acies est cuipiam oculorum, corpore alius senescit; Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Ne amores quidem sanctos a sapiente alienos esse arbitrantur. Isto modo, ne si avia quidem eius nata non esset. Itaque hic ipse iam pridem est reiectus; Maximas vero virtutes iacere omnis necesse est voluptate dominante. Magni enim aestimabat pecuniam non modo non contra leges, sed etiam legibus partam.
Gloriosa ostentatio in constituendo summo bono. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. At iste non dolendi status non vocatur voluptas. Si enim ita est, vide ne facinus facias, cum mori suadeas. Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Facile est hoc cernere in primis puerorum aetatulis. Quod non faceret, si in voluptate summum bonum poneret. Itaque eos id agere, ut a se dolores, morbos, debilitates repellant. Sic enim censent, oportunitatis esse beate vivere. Fortasse id optimum, sed ubi illud: Plus semper voluptatis? Vide, quantum, inquam, fallare, Torquate. Cur igitur easdem res, inquam, Peripateticis dicentibus verbum nullum est, quod non intellegatur? Nam Pyrrho, Aristo, Erillus iam diu abiecti.
- Identify win-wins.
Take time to consider the possible win-wins, even with potential competitors. What ar ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Negat enim summo bono afferre incrementum diem.
Quid, de quo nulla dissensio est? Hanc quoque iucunditatem, si vis, transfer in animum; Qui enim voluptatem ipsam contemnunt, iis licet dicere se acupenserem maenae non anteponere. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Illud mihi a te nimium festinanter dictum videtur, sapientis omnis esse semper beatos; Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum.
Sin tantum modo ad indicia veteris memoriae cognoscenda, curiosorum. Sed residamus, inquit, si placet. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Nihilne te delectat umquam -video, quicum loquar-, te igitur, Torquate, ipsum per se nihil delectat? Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Quod si ita sit, cur opera philosophiae sit danda nescio.
In real life, we mostly deal with repeated Prisoner's Dilemmas, where we can choose strategies to reward cooperation or punish betrayal over time. The incentives that individual decision-makers face are also altered by collective action such as rules, laws, and social punishment.
We generally also have the opportunity to communicate within our versions of the prisoner’s dilemma, so we can negotiate and seek a level of confidence not possible in the story.
Listen to this amazing podcast episode of golden balls.
Radiolab presents a truly gripping investigation into a game show based on the prisoner's dilemma. It really is fantastic storytelling and is highly recommended as a fascinating insight into this model.
Global warming.
If countries acted cooperatively, they would cut carbon emissions to help reduce global warming, possibly taking a hit to their economy as a result (let’s put renewable and green driven economies to one side for this example). However, if a country believes that another country will not take the action required then they might fear for the resulting economic advantage they will gain. The mistrust underlying a cooperative strategy, even when it's in everyone's interests, might lead to an individual strategy rather than a cooperative one.
Cigarette advertising.
A common example cited in relation to the prisoner’s dilemma is the cigarette industry. When cigarette advertising was legalised in the US competing firms theoretically could benefit from not advertising and sharing the market. If one advertised, they would gain a dominant share, however, if both advertised they would split the market and have less profit because of advertising costs. It is of course more complex than that, particularly in terms of growing a market with advertising, but that challenge plays itself out in a range of contexts.
The Prioner's Dillema is part of game theory, and provides an understanding of how we can work together, or not.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the prisoner’s dilemma into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Game theory: the prisoner’s dilemma is a model from game theory.
- Mutually assured destruction: in terms of finding a shared, often counterintuitive, interest.
Complementary models:
- Red Queen effect: in considering a potentially escalating competitive environment.
- Divide and conquer: splitting the battle rather than fighting head on.
- Cialdini’s six principles of influence: to create greater connection and trust.
- BATNA: in the context of negotiated solutions.
- SCARF model: to understand when mistrust and threat dominate.
The Prisoner's Dilemma was originally posed by mathematicians Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher while working for Rand corporation in the 1950s. It was actually named sometime later by Princeton mathematician Albert Tucker.
The model gained a boost of profile when it was featured in Robert Axelrod’s book, The Evolution of Cooperation in 1994. Now in its fifth edition, the book is the foundation for the ‘tit for tat’ strategy outlined in this model’s summary during iterative prisoner’s dilemma scenarios. Though he did note it was dependent on a number of factors. You can read more about his research in this New York Times article.
Finally, if you want to experience the concepts in the Prisoner's Dilemma, it's worth investing about 30m into this free interactive and educational game.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.