0 saved
17.3K views
Whether you’re writing fiction, starting a marketing campaign, crafting a pitch, or trying to ride the ups and downs of an entrepreneurial li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. ALIO MODO. Quae hic rei publicae vulnera inponebat, eadem ille sanabat. Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Nam, ut paulo ante docui, augendae voluptatis finis est doloris omnis amotio. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Vitiosum est enim in dividendo partem in genere numerare. Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. Eaedem enim utilitates poterunt eas labefactare atque pervertere. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata.
Sumenda potius quam expetenda. Non est enim vitium in oratione solum, sed etiam in moribus. Quae cum dixisset, finem ille. Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint. Sed utrum hortandus es nobis, Luci, inquit, an etiam tua sponte propensus es? Egone quaeris, inquit, quid sentiam? Etenim nec iustitia nec amicitia esse omnino poterunt, nisi ipsae per se expetuntur. Suam denique cuique naturam esse ad vivendum ducem.
Sint ista Graecorum; Quid igitur dubitamus in tota eius natura quaerere quid sit effectum? Quid ad utilitatem tantae pecuniae? Mene ergo et Triarium dignos existimas, apud quos turpiter loquare? Quam illa ardentis amores excitaret sui! Cur tandem? Nam si propter voluptatem, quae est ista laus, quae possit e macello peti?
- Create narratives with this structure in mind.
Rather than follow the model religiously, use it as ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae cum praeponunt, ut sit aliqua rerum selectio, naturam videntur sequi; At ille pellit, qui permulcet sensum voluptate. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur? Gracchum patrem non beatiorem fuisse quam fillum, cum alter stabilire rem publicam studuerit, alter evertere. Sed videbimus.
Ad eas enim res ab Epicuro praecepta dantur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quid enim de amicitia statueris utilitatis causa expetenda vides. Non minor, inquit, voluptas percipitur ex vilissimis rebus quam ex pretiosissimis. Age, inquies, ista parva sunt. Memini vero, inquam; Qua ex cognitione facilior facta est investigatio rerum occultissimarum.
Vide, quantum, inquam, fallare, Torquate. Multa sunt dicta ab antiquis de contemnendis ac despiciendis rebus humanis; Istam voluptatem, inquit, Epicurus ignorat? Nunc vides, quid faciat. Est autem a te semper dictum nec gaudere quemquam nisi propter corpus nec dolere. Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem;
There were many critiques about whether or not Campbell’s original model really applied to folklore, or whether he selectively cited his examples. At the same time, his model which referenced such things as ‘meeting with goddess’ and ‘woman as temptress’ was rightly critiqued from a feminist perspective. I would argue that the updated model from Vogler does address many of these issues, especially when seen as a ‘loose framework’ rather than a tight script.
Another criticism is about its complexity and therefore usefulness to be applied. Vogler obviously reduced and streamlined the stages from 17 to 12 but even so it might be too much for some applications. Indeed, Dan Harmon, who was behind Community and Rick and Morty, simplified it further to the story circle which consists of 8 stages: a character in comfort; they want something; they enter an unfamiliar situation; they adapt; they get what they wanted; they pay a price; they return to their familiar situation; they’ve changed.
Perhaps the biggest criticism in a business context is that the approach is too bloated for a busy, overwhelmed audience. If that’s the case, Minto’s Pyramid or other models might be a better approach.
So many examples.
Many examples have been cited to back up the relevance of the Hero’s Journey in storytelling. I particularly like this wonderful infographic explaining how it applies in popular movies such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Matrix, Spiderman, the Lion King and the Lord of the Rings.
The hero’s journey is a fundamental, persistent and broadly used model in storytelling.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the hero’s journey into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Three act model: a three act approach to storytelling.
- Minto's pyramid: it’s different but the simplified business focused narrative structure bares some resemblance.
Complementary models:
- Journey map: use the hero’s journey to provide a structure to a customer journey.
- Design thinking: to empathise with a protagonist or customer as part of telling their story.
- Lean startup: tell your entrepreneurial story with the hero’s journey.
- Non violent communication: another communication model that you might incorporate with the hero's journey to express yourself in a more compelling way.
First described in 1949 by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the hero’s journey, or monomyth, aimed to capture the universal or archetypal story element found everywhere. Campbell originally described 17 stages to the model. Our diagram references the modernised and simplified version presented by Christopher Vogler in his 2007 book, The Writer’s Journey, though we have still cited Campbell as the model’s originator.
For more, watch this animated video about the hero’s journey from TedEd. Or, for my favourite video on the topic, view the Glove and Boots puppet inspired explanation of the character archetypes in the hero’s journey.
The Emma Coates framework mentioned in the summary above came from this Pixar story page by David Price.
My Notes
-
1254 days ago mlrAnother limitation is the gendered nature of Campbell's model - the heroine's journey is different and well documented. The male-gendered (Campbell) hero figure acts alone, sacrifices his connections with family and society, and seeks goals that ultimately exile him from society. In contrast, the female-gendered heroine responds to a loss of power by turning to friends and family for assistance; she enables others to have agency and demonstrate their own talents; and when she regains power, there's usually a compromise solution that is designed to bring benefits to all sides. See Gail Carriger (2020) The Heroine's Journey for a fast, easy-to-read summary of both models, as applied to writing novels and movies. https://gailcarriger.com/books/the-heroines-journey-for-authors-book/
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.