They can’t have it all right? So the next time you’re sorting through a long, long list of requirements with a group of stakeholders, c ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In quo etsi est magnus, tamen nova pleraque et perpauca de moribus. Quis, quaeso, illum negat et bonum virum et comem et humanum fuisse? Quonam, inquit, modo? An quod ita callida est, ut optime possit architectari voluptates? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Hic nihil fuit, quod quaereremus. Quid ergo attinet gloriose loqui, nisi constanter loquare? Sullae consulatum? Fortasse id optimum, sed ubi illud: Plus semper voluptatis?
Atque hoc loco similitudines eas, quibus illi uti solent, dissimillimas proferebas. Duo enim genera quae erant, fecit tria. Fortasse id optimum, sed ubi illud: Plus semper voluptatis? Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Hoc enim identidem dicitis, non intellegere nos quam dicatis voluptatem. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Quamquam in hac divisione rem ipsam prorsus probo, elegantiam desidero.
At enim hic etiam dolore. Sed eum qui audiebant, quoad poterant, defendebant sententiam suam. Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur. Nos paucis ad haec additis finem faciamus aliquando; Aliud igitur esse censet gaudere, aliud non dolere. Nam diligi et carum esse iucundum est propterea, quia tutiorem vitam et voluptatem pleniorem efficit. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse;
- Identify goals and participants.
Understanding the nature of the project, including key purpose, a ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quo studio cum satiari non possint, omnium ceterarum rerum obliti níhil abiectum, nihil humile cogitant; Ipse Epicurus fortasse redderet, ut Sextus Peducaeus, Sex. Ex quo intellegitur officium medium quiddam esse, quod neque in bonis ponatur neque in contrariis. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sed erat aequius Triarium aliquid de dissensione nostra iudicare. Ex ea difficultate illae fallaciloquae, ut ait Accius, malitiae natae sunt. Itaque eos id agere, ut a se dolores, morbos, debilitates repellant. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur.
Progredientibus autem aetatibus sensim tardeve potius quasi nosmet ipsos cognoscimus. Longum est enim ad omnia respondere, quae a te dicta sunt. Cur tantas regiones barbarorum pedibus obiit, tot maria transmisit? Semovenda est igitur voluptas, non solum ut recta sequamini, sed etiam ut loqui deceat frugaliter. Vestri haec verecundius, illi fortasse constantius. Quis Aristidem non mortuum diligit?
Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Sed quia studebat laudi et dignitati, multum in virtute processerat. An me, inquam, nisi te audire vellem, censes haec dicturum fuisse? Dici enim nihil potest verius. Sed quoniam et advesperascit et mihi ad villam revertendum est, nunc quidem hactenus; Ergo hoc quidem apparet, nos ad agendum esse natos. Immo istud quidem, inquam, quo loco quidque, nisi iniquum postulo, arbitratu meo. Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget. Tanta vis admonitionis inest in locis; Tuum credibile? Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. Maximus dolor, inquit, brevis est.
The MoSCoW Method is highly subjective, not providing clear criteria for the various categories, nor providing distinctions within a category. For example, if ten requirements are identified as ‘must-haves’, there is no further prioritisation of them within the method.
Life sciences platform.
This case study from Browser, a user-centred consulting firm, describes how they helped their client to establish a life science platform using the MoSCoW Method.
The MoSCoW method is a product feature prioritisation technique that takes a slightly different approach to alternative such as RICE scores, impact effort matrix or the kano model.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the MoSCoW method into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- RICE score, impact effort matrix and Kano method: as alternatives ways of prioritising.
- Pareto principle: in establishing how to identify the 20 that delivers the 80.
- Eisenhower matrix: which is a more individually targeted approach based on similar concepts.
Complementary models:
- Agile methodology: an iterative approach that works well with this form of prioritisation.
- Empathy map: to consider the potential impact on a specific audience group.
- Zawinski’s law: a warning to prioritise and avoid product bloat.
- Lean thinking: considering how to deliver real value with fewer resources, and potentially features.
- Minimum viable product: to test core basic ‘must have’ features from a customer perspective.
- Golden circle: to identify the core purpose of your business to guide product feature decisions.
- First principles: understanding the core offer of a product and need of a customer.
The MoSCoW Method was developed by Dai Clegg who, with a rich history of big data and data modelling for a range of large corporates, now works for Evidence for Development — an NGO dedicated to reducing poverty with evidence-based decisions.
Clegg originally developed the method for prioritisation in timeboxed projects during his time with Oracle and it was later donated to the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM).
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”