There’s no denying the central role of collaboration in our connected world. But there’s also no denying that you’ve li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Color egregius, integra valitudo, summa gratia, vita denique conferta voluptatum omnium varietate. Quae cum essent dicta, discessimus. Inde igitur, inquit, ordiendum est. Et certamen honestum et disputatio splendida! omnis est enim de virtutis dignitate contentio. Quod quidem nobis non saepe contingit. Quamquam in hac divisione rem ipsam prorsus probo, elegantiam desidero. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Erit enim mecum, si tecum erit. Quodsi vultum tibi, si incessum fingeres, quo gravior viderere, non esses tui similis;
Quarum ambarum rerum cum medicinam pollicetur, luxuriae licentiam pollicetur. Quaerimus enim finem bonorum. Verba tu fingas et ea dicas, quae non sentias? Non ego tecum iam ita iocabor, ut isdem his de rebus, cum L. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit. Ergo illi intellegunt quid Epicurus dicat, ego non intellego? Sin tantum modo ad indicia veteris memoriae cognoscenda, curiosorum. Quare attende, quaeso. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem.
Possumusne ergo in vita summum bonum dicere, cum id ne in cena quidem posse videamur? Ego vero isti, inquam, permitto. Quamquam id quidem, infinitum est in hac urbe; Similiter sensus, cum accessit ad naturam, tuetur illam quidem, sed etiam se tuetur; Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Stoici autem, quod finem bonorum in una virtute ponunt, similes sunt illorum; Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Nihilne est in his rebus, quod dignum libero aut indignum esse ducamus?
-
Assign DRIs to projects and parts of projects.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Homines optimi non intellegunt totam rationem everti, si ita res se habeat. Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Ergo omni animali illud, quod appetiti positum est in eo, quod naturae est accommodatum. Sed ne, dum huic obsequor, vobis molestus sim. Experiamur igitur, inquit, etsi habet haec Stoicorum ratio difficilius quiddam et obscurius. Illa tamen simplicia, vestra versuta. In schola desinis.
Sed id ne cogitari quidem potest quale sit, ut non repugnet ipsum sibi. Quid autem habent admirationis, cum prope accesseris? Nemo igitur esse beatus potest. Non enim in selectione virtus ponenda erat, ut id ipsum, quod erat bonorum ultimum, aliud aliquid adquireret. Dolere malum est: in crucem qui agitur, beatus esse non potest. Idem etiam dolorem saepe perpetiuntur, ne, si id non faciant, incidant in maiorem.
Id quaeris, inquam, in quo, utrum respondero, verses te huc atque illuc necesse est. Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Prioris generis est docilitas, memoria; Non enim iam stirpis bonum quaeret, sed animalis. Hanc se tuus Epicurus omnino ignorare dicit quam aut qualem esse velint qui honestate summum bonum metiantur.
DRIs mean a single point of responsibility, but not necessarily a single point of thought or work. The risk with this model is that if someone is not the DRI for a task or project, they might not contribute as much, and instead focus on their own DRIs. In that sense, the risk here is inadvertently creating greater silos under the pretense of individuals taking responsibility.
Cross-functional practice.
Gloria Lin, a previous employee at Apple, advocated DRIs and implemented them at Flipboard. In a response originally posted on Quora, she explained the value to cross-functional teams:
“You want a DRI who is responsible for driving the team's sleuthing until the issue is solved. Often this is an engineering lead or an engineering program manager. Say it's mostly a mechanical engineering issue with a little bit of HW involved. Then usually a PD (product design) engineer will be the DRI, and they will work with the HW engineers to resolve the problem. If something keeps failing on the prototype testing lines, then you could have a TPM (test program manager) as DRI, working in conjunction with the Apple engineering teams, testing equipment vendor, and contract manufacturer teams.”
MobileMe and accountability.
In 2008, Apple launched MobileMe, an email system aimed to provide a seamless experience and knock BlackBerry from its business user lead. What’s that? You haven’t heard of MobileMe? That’s because it was a complete failure.
The story goes that Steve Jobs promptly gathered the MobileMe team to a Town Hall where the relevant DRI was fired and replaced. It should be noted that advocates of DRI point out that firing those responsible is not the main purpose, practice or pay off for using it.
d
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, one of the major changes he made was to get rid of traditional business divisions, with their separate Profit and Loss (P&L) responsibilities. Jobs fired the general managers of these abolished business units and instead moved to a functional organisation approach under a single business-wide P&L, and this structure remains today.
This runs against standard business wisdom that tells us that large corporations must be organised through multiple divisions, essentially run as independent business units, to promote accountability. Instead, Apple has focused on functional expertise and greater cross-functional teaming — which some argue is a key contributor to their culture of innovation.
It might be argued that DRI grew in Apple because of the gap in accountability that grew from the lack of divisional responsibility. Either way, it’s an approach that can be adopted in any organisational size and structure.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”