![search](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/index/search_icon.png)
![Moore’s Law](https://modelthinkers.com/storage/app/public/model_image/opBa50bUux3IjpUJ8Rh2meAi7TMvMJgoYSWiwDa8.png)
![Moore’s Law](https://modelthinkers.com/storage/app/public/model_image/G7o5Eo2ui9CqrTFVjvnj2ZbPShBjSvBG2cu7EE0S.png)
![view](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/eye.png)
![linkedin](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Linkdin.png)
![twitter](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Twitter.png)
![facebook](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Facebook.png)
![google](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/mail.png)
![linkedin](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Linkdin.png)
![twitter](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Twitter.png)
![facebook](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Facebook.png)
![google](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/mail.png)
Read this before you over-invest in the latest tech platform, decide to lease rather than buy that new computer, or expect to resell your smartwatc ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Maximas vero virtutes iacere omnis necesse est voluptate dominante. Consequatur summas voluptates non modo parvo, sed per me nihilo, si potest; Si longus, levis. Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. An me, inquam, nisi te audire vellem, censes haec dicturum fuisse? Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris.
Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? Sed quid minus probandum quam esse aliquem beatum nec satis beatum? In qua quid est boni praeter summam voluptatem, et eam sempiternam? Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius.
Amicitiae vero locus ubi esse potest aut quis amicus esse cuiquam, quem non ipsum amet propter ipsum? Negat enim summo bono afferre incrementum diem. Non modo carum sibi quemque, verum etiam vehementer carum esse? Duo enim genera quae erant, fecit tria. Vide, quantum, inquam, fallare, Torquate. Sed tamen enitar et, si minus multa mihi occurrent, non fugiam ista popularia. Itaque his sapiens semper vacabit. Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur.
![](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Linkdin.png)
![](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Twitter.png)
![](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/Facebook.png)
![](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/mail.png)
- Consider leasing tech.
A common application of Moore’s Law for many individuals and ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quis istud possit, inquit, negare? Erat enim Polemonis. Vitiosum est enim in dividendo partem in genere numerare. Sic, et quidem diligentius saepiusque ista loquemur inter nos agemusque communiter. Sed ad rem redeamus; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Apparet statim, quae sint officia, quae actiones. Ut non sine causa ex iis memoriae ducta sit disciplina. Atqui reperies, inquit, in hoc quidem pertinacem; Sed residamus, inquit, si placet. Non enim ipsa genuit hominem, sed accepit a natura inchoatum. Facete M.
Nam quibus rebus efficiuntur voluptates, eae non sunt in potestate sapientis. Zenonis est, inquam, hoc Stoici. Quae si potest singula consolando levare, universa quo modo sustinebit? Ait enim se, si uratur, Quam hoc suave! dicturum.
Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Hanc ergo intuens debet institutum illud quasi signum absolvere. At hoc in eo M. Facillimum id quidem est, inquam. Ita fit beatae vitae domina fortuna, quam Epicurus ait exiguam intervenire sapienti. Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur?
Moore’s Law is not a law in a scientific sense, more an observation and predictive mental model. To that end, some have argued that it is self-fulfilling, with companies feeling the need to keep up with Moore’s law — though that seems like less of a limitation and more of a complement.
Causal relationships aside, many argue that Moore’s Law is coming to its end because of the challenges to build smaller circuits, as the amount of energy needed to cool down the transistors will become larger than the amount of energy already passing through the transistor.
However, that has been a point of debate when taking Moore’s Law as a loose definition of exponential growth. While computers won’t necessarily improve in the ways Moore originally referenced, advancements in cloud computing, quantum physics and the internet of things are likely to create other forms or rapid development.
Your USB stick vs Apollo 11 mainframe computer.
It’s not just your smartphone that is more powerful than the old supercomputers, this ZME Science article notes that even a USB stick or WiFi router is technically more powerful than the 1969 mainframe computers used to guide the first rocket to the moon.
The reducing cost of technology.
Jerrold Siegel from the University of Missouri, notes in this article that: “A computer chip that contained 2,000 transistors and cost $1,000 in 1970, $500 in 1972, $250 in 1974, and $0.97 in 1990 costs less than $0.02 to manufacture today A personal computer that cost $3,000 in 1990, $1,500 in 1992, and $750 in 1994 would now cost about $5.”
Moore’s law is a model used to understand the rapid development of technology.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave Moore’s law into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Compounding: to understand the exponential growth element of Moore’s law.
- Red queen effect: understanding the pace of movement in the broader industry.
Complementary models:
- Zawinski’s law: in understanding expectations for faster development of broad solutions.
- Opportunity cost: to consider the alternative costs of commiting to technology solutions without a view to their potential obsolescence in the medium term.
- The Lindy effect: perhaps a counter to the wisdom that past time can predict future longevity.
This law was inspired by Gordon Moore, co-founder of Fairchild Semiconductor and CEO of Intel. He made the observation in 1965 when he projected the rate of growth for another decade and has expressed surprise at how long the phenomena has persisted.
Find out more in Moore's Law: The Life of Gordon Moore, Silicon Valley's Quiet Revolutionary by Arnold Thackray, David Brock, and Rachel Jones.
Also, consider whether some have been too quick to claim that Moore’s law is dead by viewing this in-depth opinion piece in Venture Beat.
![](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/common/notebook.png)
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
![Small mark](https://modelthinkers.com/public/assets/images/price/Small mark.png)
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”