Use this model to frame and inform your negotiation strategy.
Best Alternative to a Negotia ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Qualis ista philosophia est, quae non interitum afferat pravitatis, sed sit contenta mediocritate vitiorum? Nobis aliter videtur, recte secusne, postea; Qui igitur convenit ab alia voluptate dicere naturam proficisci, in alia summum bonum ponere? Quia dolori non voluptas contraria est, sed doloris privatio. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Frater et T. Tum ego: Non mehercule, inquam, soleo temere contra Stoicos, non quo illis admodum assentiar, sed pudore impedior; Bonum integritas corporis: misera debilitas. Cum autem in quo sapienter dicimus, id a primo rectissime dicitur. Quod autem satis est, eo quicquid accessit, nimium est; Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Haec bene dicuntur, nec ego repugno, sed inter sese ipsa pugnant. Hinc ceteri particulas arripere conati suam quisque videro voluit afferre sententiam. Primum divisit ineleganter; Itaque sensibus rationem adiunxit et ratione effecta sensus non reliquit. Atqui, inquam, Cato, si istud optinueris, traducas me ad te totum licebit. Putabam equidem satis, inquit, me dixisse. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. Non enim, si omnia non sequebatur, idcirco non erat ortus illinc. At, illa, ut vobis placet, partem quandam tuetur, reliquam deserit. Quo minus animus a se ipse dissidens secumque discordans gustare partem ullam liquidae voluptatis et liberae potest.
- Know your exact BATNA.
Create a list of actions you can take if no agreement is reached and choose the m ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Levatio igitur vitiorum magna fit in iis, qui habent ad virtutem progressionis aliquantum. Quamquam te quidem video minime esse deterritum. Bork Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Omnes enim iucundum motum, quo sensus hilaretur. Nam diligi et carum esse iucundum est propterea, quia tutiorem vitam et voluptatem pleniorem efficit. An eiusdem modi? Laelius clamores sofòw ille so lebat Edere compellans gumias ex ordine nostros.
Itaque dicunt nec dubitant: mihi sic usus est, tibi ut opus est facto, fac. Qui non moveatur et offensione turpitudinis et comprobatione honestatis? Atque hoc loco similitudines eas, quibus illi uti solent, dissimillimas proferebas. Quae quidem sapientes sequuntur duce natura tamquam videntes; Sit hoc ultimum bonorum, quod nunc a me defenditur;
Quacumque enim ingredimur, in aliqua historia vestigium ponimus. Miserum hominem! Si dolor summum malum est, dici aliter non potest. Tria genera cupiditatum, naturales et necessariae, naturales et non necessariae, nec naturales nec necessariae. Ut necesse sit omnium rerum, quae natura vigeant, similem esse finem, non eundem. Qualem igitur hominem natura inchoavit?
Your BATNA's strength can easily be affected by unexpected changes in conditions. At the same time, determining BATNAs for you and your counterparty is difficult due to subjectivity, as we have a tendency to overestimate the strength of our BATNA and to underestimate the strength of the other side's BATNA.
Other factors influencing BATNA, like relationship value and the likelihood of the other party maintaining their side of the bargain are also difficult to value and measure in a quantifiable manner.
Finally, using BATNA as a mental model to assist in negotiations should not be counterposed to developing rapport, active listening and other methods to connect and find potential win-win options.
The Brexit BATNA.
In August 2018 British Prime Minister Theresa May revealed a plan of contingency for exiting the European Union (E.U.) if the so-called Brexit negotiations ended in an impasse, revealing the Government’s BATNA to quell the public’s fears.
Salary negotiation.
In a salary negotiation, the employee might have a basic BATNA of their current salary, assuming that the negotiation will not end with them losing their job. They might increase this by applying for an alternative position with a higher salary, which will become their new BATNA. In such a case, it is not a like for like comparison so the BATNA might become difficult to assess. For the company, they must consider the cost of losing the staff member if they do not meet their expectations. Again this cost is hard to measure.
BATNA is a fundamental mental model in negotiation theory.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave BATNA into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- WATNA: the worst alternative to a negotiated agreement is the other side of this equation.
- Opportunity cost: BATNA is essentially the same as opportunity cost, applied to the specific purpose of negotiations.
Complementary models:
- Porter's five forces: particularly as it relates to the bargaining power of suppliers.
- Non-violent communication: challenges this model in attempting to find a win-win alternative.
- Cialidini’s six principles of persuasion: a powerful option used in conjunction with any negotiation process.
- Mutually assured destruction: where the BATNAs result in disaster for both parties, negotiation becomes an imperative.
- Cost-benefit analysis: in considering BATNA.
- Sunk cost fallacy: to support walking away from a protracted, even expensive negotiation.
BATNA was created by negotiation researchers Roger Fisher and William Ury of the Harvard Program on Negotiation and presented in their fundamental 1981 book Getting to Yes: Negotiating Without Giving In.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”