0 saved
10.2K views
There's probably a support group for angry lean practitioners who are moved beyond frustration by 'lean' becoming a not so subtle code ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Iam in altera philosophiae parte. Nunc dicam de voluptate, nihil scilicet novi, ea tamen, quae te ipsum probaturum esse confidam. Reguli reiciendam; Ergo id est convenienter naturae vivere, a natura discedere.
Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas; Si id dicis, vicimus. Mihi autem nihil tam perspicuum videtur, quam has sententias eorum philosophorum re inter se magis quam verbis dissidere; Non enim ipsa genuit hominem, sed accepit a natura inchoatum. Non minor, inquit, voluptas percipitur ex vilissimis rebus quam ex pretiosissimis.
Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Beatus autem esse in maximarum rerum timore nemo potest. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Atque ab isto capite fluere necesse est omnem rationem bonorum et malorum. Quod non subducta utilitatis ratione effici solet, sed ipsum a se oritur et sua sponte nascitur. Positum est a nostris in iis esse rebus, quae secundum naturam essent, non dolere; Illud quaero, quid ei, qui in voluptate summum bonum ponat, consentaneum sit dicere. Sed erat aequius Triarium aliquid de dissensione nostra iudicare. Quod autem in homine praestantissimum atque optimum est, id deseruit. Rapior illuc, revocat autem Antiochus, nec est praeterea, quem audiamus.
- Start and end with the customer.
Be absolutely focused on delivering customer value, which involve ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Utinam quidem dicerent alium alio beatiorem! Iam ruinas videres. Nunc de hominis summo bono quaeritur; Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Nec vero intermittunt aut admirationem earum rerum, quae sunt ab antiquis repertae, aut investigationem novarum. Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Ratio quidem vestra sic cogit. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. An potest, inquit ille, quicquam esse suavius quam nihil dolere?
Itaque eos id agere, ut a se dolores, morbos, debilitates repellant. Huic ego, si negaret quicquam interesse ad beate vivendum quali uteretur victu, concederem, laudarem etiam; Non potes, nisi retexueris illa. Isto modo ne improbos quidem, si essent boni viri. Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Itaque contra est, ac dicitis; Aliter autem vobis placet.
Utilitatis causa amicitia est quaesita. Nam quid possumus facere melius? Cur fortior sit, si illud, quod tute concedis, asperum et vix ferendum putabit? Hic ego: Pomponius quidem, inquam, noster iocari videtur, et fortasse suo iure. Quid igitur, inquit, eos responsuros putas? Scio enim esse quosdam, qui quavis lingua philosophari possint; Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; At enim hic etiam dolore.
Lean manufacturing has been criticised for its negative impact on workers — with greater stress arising from the drive to perfection and zero waste. It has also been criticised for its tactical focus, in delivering customer value now, over having a strategic view of future opportunities.
The focus on just-in-time delivery and minimising stock might create risks in some industries, particularly in the face of unpredictable or high impact demand.
Toyota and lean manufacturing.
The obvious example since they pioneered and literally wrote the book on lean, and even inspired broader agile methodologies. The Toyota Production System captured their approaches and led to increased customer satisfaction and reduced waste in their production process. It still champions this approach, incorporating automation and their just in time model of delivery.
The BBC and lean software development.
This academic case study outlines the experience of BBC applying lean software development approaches. This was combined with other agile methodologies including scrum, and led to continuous improvement, reduced risk through iterative delivery, better code, and actual business value.
Lean in healthcare.
The ThedaCare hospital used lean principles to increase nurse time with patients by 70%. This in turn increased patient safety (the ultimate customer value in their context). It was in part achieved by optimising their processes, including keeping record-keeping systems and medications inpatient rooms.
Lean thinking is a broad term that informs lean manufacturing, lean software development and lean management. As a set of principles it aligns with agile methodologies and has broad application to a range of industries.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave lean thinking into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Agile methodologies: which serves as a broader framework encompassing kanban, scrum and lean development.
- Scrum: an approach that is often combined with lean thinking.
- Kanban: particularly useful to optimise flow as part of lean thinking.
- Black box thinking: to support continuous improvement.
- First principle thinking: cutting to the core of delivering value and shedding the rest.
Complementary models:
- Zawinski’s law: challenging design bloat with a lean approach.
- Red queen effect: the challenge of simply improving processes, when competitors are striving to do the same.
- Lock-in effect: considering what would create greatest lock-in as a frame to establish customer value.
Lean Thinking roots can be traced back to Henry Ford’s approach to production lines and the ‘flow production’. However, like kanban and even agile methodology, lean thinking owes much to the innovative work done by Toyota which continued to build on Ford’s contribution.
These advances were led by Shigeco Shingo and Taiichi Ohno from the 1930s. In particular, they shifted the focus from individual machines to the broader production process and captured this approach in the Toyota Way. These approaches were subsequently given the title of ‘lean’ by John Krafcik in this 1988 article entitled the Triumph of the Lean Production System.
Soon afterwards, James P. Womack, Daniel Roos, and Daniel T, Jones published the Machine that Changed the World that further documented and outlined the foundations of lean thinking.
Finally, lean thinking was supported by mainstream management approaches when it was applied to software development. A key step in this process was the 2003 publication of Lean Software Development by Mary Poppendieck and Tom Poppendieck.
As with most complex mental models, lean was originated through an evolutionary process of practice and thought. In our diagram, we attribute it to Taichii Ohno and Shigeo Shingo, given their significant contribution to just-in-time processing and waste reduction — but it’s never as simple as that and we really could have credited several alternatives.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.