0 saved
10K views
Imagine playing a game of chess where your opponent places their queen directly in the kill zone of your pawn. You'd take it, right? If so, tha ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duarum enim vitarum nobis erunt instituta capienda. Theophrasti igitur, inquit, tibi liber ille placet de beata vita? Quae quo sunt excelsiores, eo dant clariora indicia naturae. Cupit enim dícere nihil posse ad beatam vitam deesse sapienti. Tecum optime, deinde etiam cum mediocri amico. Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Hoc enim identidem dicitis, non intellegere nos quam dicatis voluptatem. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Sed emolumenta communia esse dicuntur, recte autem facta et peccata non habentur communia. Quid ad utilitatem tantae pecuniae? Non potes, nisi retexueris illa. Illa argumenta propria videamus, cur omnia sint paria peccata. Sapientem locupletat ipsa natura, cuius divitias Epicurus parabiles esse docuit. Hoc non est positum in nostra actione.
Nam adhuc, meo fortasse vitio, quid ego quaeram non perspicis. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. Non quaero, quid dicat, sed quid convenienter possit rationi et sententiae suae dicere. Serpere anguiculos, nare anaticulas, evolare merulas, cornibus uti videmus boves, nepas aculeis. Qui convenit?
- Stop and ask ‘and what would happen next?’
Rather than commit to an initial appealing decisi ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quarum ambarum rerum cum medicinam pollicetur, luxuriae licentiam pollicetur. Et quidem, Cato, hanc totam copiam iam Lucullo nostro notam esse oportebit; Quo modo autem philosophus loquitur? Amicitiam autem adhibendam esse censent, quia sit ex eo genere, quae prosunt. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Miserum hominem! Si dolor summum malum est, dici aliter non potest. Eiuro, inquit adridens, iniquum, hac quidem de re; Aliter homines, aliter philosophos loqui putas oportere? Non enim solum Torquatus dixit quid sentiret, sed etiam cur. Fortitudinis quaedam praecepta sunt ac paene leges, quae effeminari virum vetant in dolore. Qualem igitur hominem natura inchoavit? Deque his rebus satis multa in nostris de re publica libris sunt dicta a Laelio.
Hoc sic expositum dissimile est superiori. Quae hic rei publicae vulnera inponebat, eadem ille sanabat. Nos paucis ad haec additis finem faciamus aliquando; Quod si ita sit, cur opera philosophiae sit danda nescio. Et quidem Arcesilas tuus, etsi fuit in disserendo pertinacior, tamen noster fuit; Stoici autem, quod finem bonorum in una virtute ponunt, similes sunt illorum; Certe nihil nisi quod possit ipsum propter se iure laudari. Dempta enim aeternitate nihilo beatior Iuppiter quam Epicurus; Sed ad haec, nisi molestum est, habeo quae velim. Quid in isto egregio tuo officio et tanta fide-sic enim existimo-ad corpus refers? Facit igitur Lucius noster prudenter, qui audire de summo bono potissimum velit;
Second-Order Thinking is effortful and can ultimately be wildly unreliable. Each step away from the initial direct causal relationship — between a decision and the immediate implication — creates new factors to consider, other players and agents, and general complexity. It is difficult to predict or consider all of these factors in any meaningful way.
Automation and the fourth industrial revolution.
One of the contradictions of capitalism that is still being played out in real time around us, is the impact of automation. There is still some debate about the impact of automation on jobs. While there is general agreement that we are losing many jobs, it’s unclear how many new jobs are being created through a ‘robot driven economy’.
A first order thinking approach to automation would say ‘we can save on labour costs and be more efficient by automating’. The second order and beyond thinking might raise questions about less people in the workforce and the implications on reducing consumer power — thus costing those businesses.
Again, this is still being played out with some debate about actual implications (second order thinking is often harder to predict), but has led to growing calls for things such as a universal basic income.
Asimov and the Foundation series.
I couldn’t resist putting this geeky reference in here. Science fiction writer Asimov coined the concept of psychohistory in the Foundation series. This is the (fictional) combination of history, sociology and maths to make predictions about large groups of people. The idea was that it was hard to predict the behaviour of individuals, but the behaviour of groups of people and civilisations was highly predictable through what could be seen as a type of second order thinking.
Chess.
Chess and other strategy games capture this well. It’s often tempting to take a piece in chess, when in reality it is a play by your opponent to draw you into a trap. The immediate gain of taking a piece leads to long term consequences of weakening your position and leading you to lose the game.
Second-Order Thinking is a simple and powerful mental model to prevent reactive decisions and consider long term implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave Second-Order Thinking into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: first-order thinking sits within fast thinking.
- The domino effect: using second order thinking to gain momentum.
- Opportunity cost: considering the cost of the next best option.
- Compounding: how an initial decision can have a compounded effect.
- Butterfly effect: how small decisions can make large impacts over time.
- 5 whys and fishbone diagram: to dig deeper beyond initial causes.
Complementary models:
- Feedback loops: generating regular feedback points to inform the accuracy of second order thinking.
- Agile methodology: providing an iterative process to test and learn from.
- Probability thinking: to consider the likelihood of various potential outcomes.
- High velocity decisions: particularly considering whether something is reversible.
- First principles and ockham's razor: to cut down the assumptions built up over second order thinking.
- 5 whys: to consider a retrospective view of cause in contrast to the future-focused nature of second order thinking.
The Second-Order Thinking mental model has been developed by Howard Marks, the co-chairman of Oaktree investments, who presented it as second-level thinking in his book The Most Important Thing. As he explained: “First-level thinkers look for simple formulas and easy answers. Second-level thinkers know that success in investing is the antithesis of simple.”
My Notes
-
1367 days ago arun , CoFounder ModelThinkers & keynote speakerI love this. I'm trying to embed the actionable takeaway of asking 'and what would happen next' for any significant decisions.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.