0 saved
15.3K views
Whether you’re writing fiction, starting a marketing campaign, crafting a pitch, or trying to ride the ups and downs of an entrepreneurial li ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Num igitur eum postea censes anxio animo aut sollicito fuisse? Pudebit te, inquam, illius tabulae, quam Cleanthes sane commode verbis depingere solebat. An dubium est, quin virtus ita maximam partem optineat in rebus humanis, ut reliquas obruat? Solum praeterea formosum, solum liberum, solum civem, stultost; Sed ille, ut dixi, vitiose. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sint ista Graecorum; Efficiens dici potest. Nam aliquando posse recte fieri dicunt nulla expectata nec quaesita voluptate. Quid enim ab antiquis ex eo genere, quod ad disserendum valet, praetermissum est?
Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. Hic ambiguo ludimur. Idem etiam dolorem saepe perpetiuntur, ne, si id non faciant, incidant in maiorem. Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro; Bork Sit enim idem caecus, debilis. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius.
Conclusum est enim contra Cyrenaicos satis acute, nihil ad Epicurum. Ea, quae dialectici nunc tradunt et docent, nonne ab illis instituta sunt aut inventa sunt? Et quod est munus, quod opus sapientiae? Aut haec tibi, Torquate, sunt vituperanda aut patrocinium voluptatis repudiandum. Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Scientiam pollicentur, quam non erat mirum sapientiae cupido patria esse cariorem. Tuo vero id quidem, inquam, arbitratu. Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi?
- Create narratives with this structure in mind.
Rather than follow the model religiously, use it as ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quis enim potest ea, quae probabilia videantur ei, non probare? Quis Aristidem non mortuum diligit? Nonne videmus quanta perturbatio rerum omnium consequatur, quanta confusio? Quae autem natura suae primae institutionis oblita est? Occultum facinus esse potuerit, gaudebit; Te enim iudicem aequum puto, modo quae dicat ille bene noris. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Non potes ergo ista tueri, Torquate, mihi crede, si te ipse et tuas cogitationes et studia perspexeris;
Mihi, inquam, qui te id ipsum rogavi? Ostendit pedes et pectus. Stuprata per vim Lucretia a regis filio testata civis se ipsa interemit. Haec igitur Epicuri non probo, inquam. Sed ad bona praeterita redeamus.
Sumenda potius quam expetenda. Equidem, sed audistine modo de Carneade? Qua tu etiam inprudens utebare non numquam. Quare, quoniam de primis naturae commodis satis dietum est nunc de maioribus consequentibusque videamus. Vitae autem degendae ratio maxime quidem illis placuit quieta. Sin dicit obscurari quaedam nec apparere, quia valde parva sint, nos quoque concedimus; An, partus ancillae sitne in fructu habendus, disseretur inter principes civitatis, P. Cupit enim dícere nihil posse ad beatam vitam deesse sapienti. Compensabatur, inquit, cum summis doloribus laetitia.
There were many critiques about whether or not Campbell’s original model really applied to folklore, or whether he selectively cited his examples. At the same time, his model which referenced such things as ‘meeting with goddess’ and ‘woman as temptress’ was rightly critiqued from a feminist perspective. I would argue that the updated model from Vogler does address many of these issues, especially when seen as a ‘loose framework’ rather than a tight script.
Another criticism is about its complexity and therefore usefulness to be applied. Vogler obviously reduced and streamlined the stages from 17 to 12 but even so it might be too much for some applications. Indeed, Dan Harmon, who was behind Community and Rick and Morty, simplified it further to the story circle which consists of 8 stages: a character in comfort; they want something; they enter an unfamiliar situation; they adapt; they get what they wanted; they pay a price; they return to their familiar situation; they’ve changed.
Perhaps the biggest criticism in a business context is that the approach is too bloated for a busy, overwhelmed audience. If that’s the case, Minto’s Pyramid or other models might be a better approach.
So many examples.
Many examples have been cited to back up the relevance of the Hero’s Journey in storytelling. I particularly like this wonderful infographic explaining how it applies in popular movies such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Matrix, Spiderman, the Lion King and the Lord of the Rings.
The hero’s journey is a fundamental, persistent and broadly used model in storytelling.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave the hero’s journey into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Three act model: a three act approach to storytelling.
- Minto's pyramid: it’s different but the simplified business focused narrative structure bares some resemblance.
Complementary models:
- Journey map: use the hero’s journey to provide a structure to a customer journey.
- Design thinking: to empathise with a protagonist or customer as part of telling their story.
- Lean startup: tell your entrepreneurial story with the hero’s journey.
- Non violent communication: another communication model that you might incorporate with the hero's journey to express yourself in a more compelling way.
First described in 1949 by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, the hero’s journey, or monomyth, aimed to capture the universal or archetypal story element found everywhere. Campbell originally described 17 stages to the model. Our diagram references the modernised and simplified version presented by Christopher Vogler in his 2007 book, The Writer’s Journey, though we have still cited Campbell as the model’s originator.
For more, watch this animated video about the hero’s journey from TedEd. Or, for my favourite video on the topic, view the Glove and Boots puppet inspired explanation of the character archetypes in the hero’s journey.
The Emma Coates framework mentioned in the summary above came from this Pixar story page by David Price.
My Notes
-
1127 days ago mlrAnother limitation is the gendered nature of Campbell's model - the heroine's journey is different and well documented. The male-gendered (Campbell) hero figure acts alone, sacrifices his connections with family and society, and seeks goals that ultimately exile him from society. In contrast, the female-gendered heroine responds to a loss of power by turning to friends and family for assistance; she enables others to have agency and demonstrate their own talents; and when she regains power, there's usually a compromise solution that is designed to bring benefits to all sides. See Gail Carriger (2020) The Heroine's Journey for a fast, easy-to-read summary of both models, as applied to writing novels and movies. https://gailcarriger.com/books/the-heroines-journey-for-authors-book/
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.