0 saved
18.1K views
This model from Ancient Greece has helped define the art of persuasion for over 2,000 years and continues to serve as a guide for impactf ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aut unde est hoc contritum vetustate proverbium: quicum in tenebris? Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Et quidem, inquit, vehementer errat; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Nam quid possumus facere melius? Quem si tenueris, non modo meum Ciceronem, sed etiam me ipsum abducas licebit.
Ut alios omittam, hunc appello, quem ille unum secutus est. Tum Torquatus: Prorsus, inquit, assentior;
Putabam equidem satis, inquit, me dixisse. Hoc enim identidem dicitis, non intellegere nos quam dicatis voluptatem. Bonum incolumis acies: misera caecitas. Atqui iste locus est, Piso, tibi etiam atque etiam confirmandus, inquam; Idem fecisset Epicurus, si sententiam hanc, quae nunc Hieronymi est, coniunxisset cum Aristippi vetere sententia. Quod quidem iam fit etiam in Academia. Quam illa ardentis amores excitaret sui! Cur tandem? Quamvis enim depravatae non sint, pravae tamen esse possunt.
-
Deeply understand your audience.
What are their current ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. A primo, ut opinor, animantium ortu petitur origo summi boni. Cur, nisi quod turpis oratio est? Tum, Quintus et Pomponius cum idem se velle dixissent, Piso exorsus est.
Hic nihil fuit, quod quaereremus. Quorum sine causa fieri nihil putandum est. Primum in nostrane potestate est, quid meminerimus? Ego vero volo in virtute vim esse quam maximam; Ut enim consuetudo loquitur, id solum dicitur honestum, quod est populari fama gloriosum. Quae dici eadem de ceteris virtutibus possunt, quarum omnium fundamenta vos in voluptate tamquam in aqua ponitis.
Nec lapathi suavitatem acupenseri Galloni Laelius anteponebat, sed suavitatem ipsam neglegebat; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Sed non alienum est, quo facilius vis verbi intellegatur, rationem huius verbi faciendi Zenonis exponere. Quorum sine causa fieri nihil putandum est. Mihi vero, inquit, placet agi subtilius et, ut ipse dixisti, pressius. Quippe: habes enim a rhetoribus; Ut necesse sit omnium rerum, quae natura vigeant, similem esse finem, non eundem. Aeque enim contingit omnibus fidibus, ut incontentae sint. Sed quid sentiat, non videtis. Nemo igitur esse beatus potest. Experiamur igitur, inquit, etsi habet haec Stoicorum ratio difficilius quiddam et obscurius.
Plato, Aristotle’s teacher, was critical of persuasion techniques, seemingly to rally against the form and emotional element winning arguments over a logical case as an example of manipulation. Aristotle did counter this, suggesting that the art of persuasion was a necessary but neutral tool and that it should be used ethically.
Other criticism of the model tends to be in its application, as it sets a broad framework but potentially lacks more practical application. In other words, while a useful guide, the model still takes considerable skill to apply effectively and consistently.
Legal application.
This 2014 research paper describes how Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle is a crucial tool in the courtroom. The author explains:
“Logos, ethos, and pathos, a persuader’s logical, credibility-related, and emotional appeals, when used in concert, create a whole argument. This argument is one which takes into account the human element as well as the rational and logical needs of the law in its pursuit of justice. Classical Aristotelian rhetoric, thus, must not be dismissed by the advocate hoping to most effectively represent his client. Nor should it be dismissed by the legal community as form over substance.As I have demonstrated, the end result of an attorney utilizing Aristotle’s three modes together is the fairest result possible in a given situation, so substance is not sacrificed, and effective form is still maintained.”
“I have a dream.”
I could have chosen an analysis of any modern speech based on Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, I went with Martin Luthor King’s classic.
This article breaks it down, including noting the following:
Ethos:
-
By way of establishing his intentions, “In his speech, King frequently looks back at moments in American history and refers to the leaders who laid the foundation of free America.”
Pathos:
-
Given the moment of anger and frustration he was speaking in, there’s no wonder that Pathos was a main ingredient. “His speech keeps growing more dramatic and engaging. King tries to make the frustration visible that years of neglect have caused.”
Logos:
-
King paints the future state, the ‘dream’, and lays out a path to achieve it, heavily referencing American history.
m
Aristotle’s Rhetoric was set out in his book On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse. I say 'book' because it has been published as such but, like his other works, seems to have been a collection of his student’s notes in response to his lectures. His body of work on persuasion did progress and shift over his life, though these three appeals remained consistent.
Other modern sources to dive into this model include the work of Carmine Gallo, see his HBR article on the topic; and Sam Leith’s Words Like Loaded Pistols. For a more in-depth albeit slightly academic view of this model, you can also visit the entry in Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.