“The statement ‘Hitler loved dogs and little children’ is shocking no matter how many times you hear it, because an ... Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quis istud, quaeso, nesciebat? Dic in quovis conventu te omnia facere, ne doleas. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. Sed quanta sit alias, nunc tantum possitne esse tanta. Ita ne hoc quidem modo paria peccata sunt. An eum discere ea mavis, quae cum plane perdidiceriti nihil sciat? Quid ergo attinet dicere: Nihil haberem, quod reprehenderem, si finitas cupiditates haberent? An hoc usque quaque, aliter in vita? Primum divisit ineleganter; Idemque diviserunt naturam hominis in animum et corpus. Itaque nostrum est-quod nostrum dico, artis est-ad ea principia, quae accepimus. Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Minime vero istorum quidem, inquit. Cuius etiam illi hortuli propinqui non memoriam solum mihi afferunt, sed ipsum videntur in conspectu meo ponere. Philosophi autem in suis lectulis plerumque moriuntur. Quod si ita sit, cur opera philosophiae sit danda nescio. Quid ei reliquisti, nisi te, quoquo modo loqueretur, intellegere, quid diceret?
-
Strive for a positive first impression.
Knowing the central r ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Gloriosa ostentatio in constituendo summo bono. Sed tempus est, si videtur, et recta quidem ad me. Immo videri fortasse. Res enim fortasse verae, certe graves, non ita tractantur, ut debent, sed aliquanto minutius.
Quod ea non occurrentia fingunt, vincunt Aristonem; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Non quam nostram quidem, inquit Pomponius iocans; Conferam tecum, quam cuique verso rem subicias; Quorum altera prosunt, nocent altera. Tum Piso: Quoniam igitur aliquid omnes, quid Lucius noster? Que Manilium, ab iisque M. Non ego tecum iam ita iocabor, ut isdem his de rebus, cum L. Quid ergo aliud intellegetur nisi uti ne quae pars naturae neglegatur? Ab his oratores, ab his imperatores ac rerum publicarum principes extiterunt.
Magni enim aestimabat pecuniam non modo non contra leges, sed etiam legibus partam. Id mihi magnum videtur. Sed quid minus probandum quam esse aliquem beatum nec satis beatum? Estne, quaeso, inquam, sitienti in bibendo voluptas? Non potes, nisi retexueris illa. At tu eadem ista dic in iudicio aut, si coronam times, dic in senatu. Hoc enim identidem dicitis, non intellegere nos quam dicatis voluptatem.
There has been considerable research and evidence of the Halo Effect in a range of domains, and it is a long-established cognitive bias. The only limitation that we can call out is that, while it might be at play in a given situation, it’s likely not the only bias or factor to consider.
Military judgment.
Edward Thorndike first coined the Halo Effect when studying how military officers judged their subordinates in a 1920 study. The officers would not talk to the men (yes, all men, it was 1920 after all), but consistently rated their intelligence and character based on physical strength and attributes.
Celebrity ambassadors.
The constant hiring of celebrities to represent companies is an example of those companies trying to benefit from the celebrities Halo Effect. It’s also why such celebrities are quickly dropped at the first sign of a scandal or negative consumer perception.
d
The Halo Effect was identified in broad terms as far back as 1907 by Fredrick Wells, a US-based psychologist. However, Edward Thorndike is credited with coining the effect in 1920 and essentially defining it as a cognitive bias.
Thorndike’s conclusions came from studies with the military where officers were asked to rate subordinates on a number of traits such as physique, character, leadership, and intelligence without having spoken to them. Thorndike noted that the officers’ judgment of a range of qualities was consistently driven by unrelated physical attributes. Basically, the servicemen who were taller and looked stronger were consistently rated as more intelligent etc.
There have been a number of studies supporting these findings in a range of domains. And, in 1964, Polish psychologist Solomon Asch found that first impressions were more important than subsequent impressions in establishing the Halo Effect.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”