Save to My Latticework unsave

Pugh Matrix
Pugh Matrix
Pugh Matrix
save0 saved view5.9K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

Also known as the Decision Grid, Selection Matrix, Weighted-Decision-Matrix and Pugh Method, this model will help you make systemati ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae in controversiam veniunt, de iis, si placet, disseramus. Sed haec omittamus; Tum ille timide vel potius verecunde: Facio, inquit. Quis est, qui non oderit libidinosam, protervam adolescentiam?

Idem iste, inquam, de voluptate quid sentit? Restinguet citius, si ardentem acceperit. Hoc loco discipulos quaerere videtur, ut, qui asoti esse velint, philosophi ante fiant. Quod maxime efficit Theophrasti de beata vita liber, in quo multum admodum fortunae datur. Nam si quae sunt aliae, falsum est omnis animi voluptates esse e corporis societate. Dicet pro me ipsa virtus nec dubitabit isti vestro beato M. Quo studio Aristophanem putamus aetatem in litteris duxisse? Quod quidem nobis non saepe contingit.

Quae fere omnia appellantur uno ingenii nomine, easque virtutes qui habent, ingeniosi vocantur. Neminem videbis ita laudatum, ut artifex callidus comparandarum voluptatum diceretur. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba.

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Brainstorm and then select the criteria. 

Consider the e ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nihilo beatiorem esse Metellum quam Regulum. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Et quod est munus, quod opus sapientiae? Ipse Epicurus fortasse redderet, ut Sextus Peducaeus, Sex. Non minor, inquit, voluptas percipitur ex vilissimis rebus quam ex pretiosissimis. Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro; Nunc haec primum fortasse audientis servire debemus.

Bona autem corporis huic sunt, quod posterius posui, similiora. An vero, inquit, quisquam potest probare, quod perceptfum, quod. Tu autem negas fortem esse quemquam posse, qui dolorem malum putet. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Sequitur disserendi ratio cognitioque naturae; Eodem modo is enim tibi nemo dabit, quod, expetendum sit, id esse laudabile. Non autem hoc: igitur ne illud quidem. Non quaeritur autem quid naturae tuae consentaneum sit, sed quid disciplinae. Paulum, cum regem Persem captum adduceret, eodem flumine invectio? Ita similis erit ei finis boni, atque antea fuerat, neque idem tamen;

Haec quo modo conveniant, non sane intellego. Tuo vero id quidem, inquam, arbitratu. Quasi ego id curem, quid ille aiat aut neget. Nec hoc ille non vidit, sed verborum magnificentia est et gloria delectatus. Parvi enim primo ortu sic iacent, tamquam omnino sine animo sint. At ille non pertimuit saneque fidenter: Istis quidem ipsis verbis, inquit; Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. Non igitur potestis voluptate omnia dirigentes aut tueri aut retinere virtutem. Ut proverbia non nulla veriora sint quam vestra dogmata. Nam de summo mox, ut dixi, videbimus et ad id explicandum disputationem omnem conferemus.

Limitations

The main problem with the Pugh Matrix is humanity. Our internal biases will still play out in the selection and weighting of criteria and assessing various options. That said, it does present a more accountable and systematic approach that might expose and interrupt such biases more than most alternatives. 

Another challenge is that this process often results in no clear winners. That’s where we’d suggest considering combining selection criteria with the MOSCOW Method, particularly having ‘must have’ criteria, beyond weighting, as a clear qualification point.

In Practice

Toasting bread. 

The example below was developed by Dr Stuart Burge in his paper on The Systems Engineering ToolBox and uses the method to determine the best way to toast bread. The example selects a toaster as the baseline. 

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

ad

Origins & Resources

The Pugh Method was developed by Stuard Pugh, a UK-based product designer turned academic, whose 1991 book Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering explored the methodology of design.

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.