Save to My Latticework unsave

Pugh Matrix
Pugh Matrix
Pugh Matrix
save0 saved view8.8K views
Share this with your network
Share this with your network
Overview

Also known as the Decision Grid, Selection Matrix, Weighted-Decision-Matrix and Pugh Method, this model will help you make systemati ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Habent enim et bene longam et satis litigiosam disputationem. Zenonem roges; Et si turpitudinem fugimus in statu et motu corporis, quid est cur pulchritudinem non sequamur? Sin laboramus, quis est, qui alienae modum statuat industriae? Nam quid possumus facere melius?

Sed audiamus ipsum: Compensabatur, inquit, tamen cum his omnibus animi laetitia, quam capiebam memoria rationum inventorumque nostrorum. Septem autem illi non suo, sed populorum suffragio omnium nominati sunt. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.

Aliter homines, aliter philosophos loqui putas oportere? Haec dicuntur inconstantissime. Nunc agendum est subtilius. Ipse Epicurus fortasse redderet, ut Sextus Peducaeus, Sex. Ea possunt paria non esse. Atque his de rebus et splendida est eorum et illustris oratio. Non est igitur voluptas bonum. Intrandum est igitur in rerum naturam et penitus quid ea postulet pervidendum; Si longus, levis dictata sunt. At quanta conantur! Mundum hunc omnem oppidum esse nostrum! Incendi igitur eos, qui audiunt, vides.

Share this model with your network to be smarter, faster, together!
Actionable Takeaways
  • Brainstorm and then select the criteria. 

Consider the e ...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quid, quod res alia tota est? Utinam quidem dicerent alium alio beatiorem! Iam ruinas videres. Scio enim esse quosdam, qui quavis lingua philosophari possint; Cave putes quicquam esse verius. Aliter enim explicari, quod quaeritur, non potest. Si enim, ut mihi quidem videtur, non explet bona naturae voluptas, iure praetermissa est; Tum Torquatus: Prorsus, inquit, assentior; Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quibus natura iure responderit non esse verum aliunde finem beate vivendi, a se principia rei gerendae peti; Videmusne ut pueri ne verberibus quidem a contemplandis rebus perquirendisque deterreantur?

An ea, quae per vinitorem antea consequebatur, per se ipsa curabit? Hoc loco tenere se Triarius non potuit. Hoc sic expositum dissimile est superiori. Indicant pueri, in quibus ut in speculis natura cernitur. De vacuitate doloris eadem sententia erit. Qui-vere falsone, quaerere mittimus-dicitur oculis se privasse; Nos quidem Virtutes sic natae sumus, ut tibi serviremus, aliud negotii nihil habemus. Nam his libris eum malo quam reliquo ornatu villae delectari. Color egregius, integra valitudo, summa gratia, vita denique conferta voluptatum omnium varietate. Nunc omni virtuti vitium contrario nomine opponitur. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis.

Tum Triarius: Posthac quidem, inquit, audacius. At iam decimum annum in spelunca iacet. Quae in controversiam veniunt, de iis, si placet, disseramus. Tu enim ista lenius, hic Stoicorum more nos vexat. Sit sane ista voluptas. Quod idem cum vestri faciant, non satis magnam tribuunt inventoribus gratiam. Contemnit enim disserendi elegantiam, confuse loquitur. Tum Triarius: Posthac quidem, inquit, audacius.

Limitations

The main problem with the Pugh Matrix is humanity. Our internal biases will still play out in the selection and weighting of criteria and assessing various options. That said, it does present a more accountable and systematic approach that might expose and interrupt such biases more than most alternatives. 

Another challenge is that this process often results in no clear winners. That’s where we’d suggest considering combining selection criteria with the MOSCOW Method, particularly having ‘must have’ criteria, beyond weighting, as a clear qualification point.

In Practice

Toasting bread. 

The example below was developed by Dr Stuart Burge in his paper on The Systems Engineering ToolBox and uses the method to determine the best way to toast bread. The example selects a toaster as the baseline. 

Build your latticework
This model will help you to:

ad

Origins & Resources

The Pugh Method was developed by Stuard Pugh, a UK-based product designer turned academic, whose 1991 book Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering explored the methodology of design.

My Notes

    Nothing here yet. Join ModelThinkers and login to be the first to comment.
Already a ModelThinkers member? Please log in here.

Oops, That’s Members’ Only!

Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.

ModelThinkers membership at a glance:

Small mark
UNLOCK EVERYTHING
Access all mental models and premium content.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR LATTICEWORK
Save models to your personal list.
Small mark
QUICKLY MEMORISE MODELS
Use our Learn function to embed models to memory
Small mark
PERSONALISE MODELS
Add your own notes and reminders.
Small mark
BUILD YOUR ‘EXTERNAL BRAIN’
Discover a new idea? Capture it by adding a new model.
Small mark
JOIN THE MT COMMUNITY
Rate models, comment and access exclusive events.

“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”

Arun Pradhan & Shai Desai
CoFounders, ModelThinkers.

You Might Also Like:

- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.