0 saved
11.5K views
So you suck at delayed gratification? Can’t consistently invest your savings for the big pay off for when you retire? Or perhaps you’re ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aperiendum est igitur, quid sit voluptas; Propter nos enim illam, non propter eam nosmet ipsos diligimus. Cur igitur easdem res, inquam, Peripateticis dicentibus verbum nullum est, quod non intellegatur? Quis tibi ergo istud dabit praeter Pyrrhonem, Aristonem eorumve similes, quos tu non probas? Expressa vero in iis aetatibus, quae iam confirmatae sunt. Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Quare hoc videndum est, possitne nobis hoc ratio philosophorum dare. Videsne quam sit magna dissensio? Cur, nisi quod turpis oratio est? Ita cum ea volunt retinere, quae superiori sententiae conveniunt, in Aristonem incidunt; Verum hoc idem saepe faciamus. Non laboro, inquit, de nomine. Quid turpius quam sapientis vitam ex insipientium sermone pendere? Murenam te accusante defenderem. Ut in geometria, prima si dederis, danda sunt omnia. Nihilo beatiorem esse Metellum quam Regulum.
Eadem fortitudinis ratio reperietur. Atque haec coniunctio confusioque virtutum tamen a philosophis ratione quadam distinguitur. Conferam tecum, quam cuique verso rem subicias; Bork Uterque enim summo bono fruitur, id est voluptate. Quae cum praeponunt, ut sit aliqua rerum selectio, naturam videntur sequi;
- For decisions, use slow thinking to interrupt your bias.
Organise processes or teams to interrupt ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In quo etsi est magnus, tamen nova pleraque et perpauca de moribus. Vide ne ista sint Manliana vestra aut maiora etiam, si imperes quod facere non possim. Consequentia exquirere, quoad sit id, quod volumus, effectum. At enim hic etiam dolore. Atqui eorum nihil est eius generis, ut sit in fine atque extrerno bonorum. Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Tu quidem reddes;
At Zeno eum non beatum modo, sed etiam divitem dicere ausus est. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Quodsi ipsam honestatem undique pertectam atque absolutam. Neque solum ea communia, verum etiam paria esse dixerunt. Huic mori optimum esse propter desperationem sapientiae, illi propter spem vivere. Bork Qui est in parvis malis. Cum id fugiunt, re eadem defendunt, quae Peripatetici, verba. Multoque hoc melius nos veriusque quam Stoici. Memini vero, inquam;
Non est ista, inquam, Piso, magna dissensio. Si quicquam extra virtutem habeatur in bonis.
Some criticise the evidence behind Hyperbolic Discounting as, similar to so many behavioural science research, largely relying on university students as they are a cheap and available group of test subjects. Such critics argue that more experienced and older people consider longer views and criteria for their decision making, though this has not been proven through research yet.
Other criticisms do not undermine the observed behaviour behind Hyperbolic Discounting — of people choosing instant gratification — rather the reasoning behind it. So, for example, some point to the role of cravings, arousal and emotions in people seeking immediate rewards — though again, in my view this is relatively academic as the end result remains the same.
$100 versus $120.
Hyperbolic discounting is perhaps best known for the $100 versus $120 experiment. Participants in this experiment were offered a choice between receiving $100 today versus $120 in a week. Most people would choose the $100 immediately. Then they were offered the choice between $100 in a year versus $120 in a year and a week. From a rational perspective, these questions are identical — yet when adding the ‘year’, most people chose to take the $120 option.
Climate change.
This one’s a bit opinionated perhaps, but is it really? It is now pretty clear that climate change is a massive threat to humanity — there, I said it. Yet humans are reticent to act. Compare that to how most governments invested in dealing with the threat of covid when it was having clear immediate impacts. The immediate threat gets the attention, the distant one can be all too easily ignored.
Hyperbolic discounting is a core model in behavioural economics and has countless implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave hyperbolic discounting into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: the model that explains the broader backdrop of heuristics and behavioural economics.
- Loss aversion: another fundamental and intrinsically linked model
Complementary models:
- Habit loop: particularly B.J. Foggs idea of ‘tiny habits’ or immediate rewards.
- Systems versus goals: in establishing the routine over relying on a distant goal.
- Divide and conquer: in respect to breaking down large projects.
- Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion: particularly in terms of freemium and quick value in relation to reciprocity.
Hyperbolic discounting was built on the work of Richard Hernstein who developed a ‘matching law’ before coining the term ‘hyperbolic discounting’ in a 1961 paper.
My Notes
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”
You Might Also Like:
- Actionable summaries of the world's most powerful ideas.
Subscribe now and download this practical guide to transform your thinking, plus recieve one short, powerful and actionable idea in your inbox each month.