So you suck at delayed gratification? Can’t consistently invest your savings for the big pay off for when you retire? Or perhaps you’re ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. At ego quem huic anteponam non audeo dicere; Dolor ergo, id est summum malum, metuetur semper, etiamsi non aderit; Ex ea difficultate illae fallaciloquae, ut ait Accius, malitiae natae sunt. Et certamen honestum et disputatio splendida! omnis est enim de virtutis dignitate contentio. Nec vero pietas adversus deos nec quanta iis gratia debeatur sine explicatione naturae intellegi potest. At enim hic etiam dolore. Duo Reges: constructio interrete. Et ille ridens: Video, inquit, quid agas;
Varietates autem iniurasque fortunae facile veteres philosophorum praeceptis instituta vita superabat. Haec non erant eius, qui innumerabilis mundos infinitasque regiones, quarum nulla esset ora, nulla extremitas, mente peragravisset. Quo modo autem optimum, si bonum praeterea nullum est? Quae fere omnia appellantur uno ingenii nomine, easque virtutes qui habent, ingeniosi vocantur.
Sed in rebus apertissimis nimium longi sumus. Progredientibus autem aetatibus sensim tardeve potius quasi nosmet ipsos cognoscimus. Refert tamen, quo modo. An est aliquid, quod te sua sponte delectet? Omnia contraria, quos etiam insanos esse vultis. At enim hic etiam dolore. Ergo omni animali illud, quod appetiti positum est in eo, quod naturae est accommodatum.
- For decisions, use slow thinking to interrupt your bias.
Organise processes or teams to interrupt ...
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quae fere omnia appellantur uno ingenii nomine, easque virtutes qui habent, ingeniosi vocantur. Nam adhuc, meo fortasse vitio, quid ego quaeram non perspicis. Pauca mutat vel plura sane; Iam id ipsum absurdum, maximum malum neglegi. Sin autem eos non probabat, quid attinuit cum iis, quibuscum re concinebat, verbis discrepare? Duo Reges: constructio interrete.
Nam prius a se poterit quisque discedere quam appetitum earum rerum, quae sibi conducant, amittere. Numquam facies. Egone quaeris, inquit, quid sentiam? Videmus igitur ut conquiescere ne infantes quidem possint. Si quidem, inquit, tollerem, sed relinquo. In quibus doctissimi illi veteres inesse quiddam caeleste et divinum putaverunt. Inde sermone vario sex illa a Dipylo stadia confecimus. Facit enim ille duo seiuncta ultima bonorum, quae ut essent vera, coniungi debuerunt;
Quicquid enim a sapientia proficiscitur, id continuo debet expletum esse omnibus suis partibus; Illa tamen simplicia, vestra versuta. De quibus cupio scire quid sentias. Ne discipulum abducam, times. Nec vero pietas adversus deos nec quanta iis gratia debeatur sine explicatione naturae intellegi potest. Quia nec honesto quic quam honestius nec turpi turpius. Non dolere, inquam, istud quam vim habeat postea videro;
Some criticise the evidence behind Hyperbolic Discounting as, similar to so many behavioural science research, largely relying on university students as they are a cheap and available group of test subjects. Such critics argue that more experienced and older people consider longer views and criteria for their decision making, though this has not been proven through research yet.
Other criticisms do not undermine the observed behaviour behind Hyperbolic Discounting — of people choosing instant gratification — rather the reasoning behind it. So, for example, some point to the role of cravings, arousal and emotions in people seeking immediate rewards — though again, in my view this is relatively academic as the end result remains the same.
$100 versus $120.
Hyperbolic discounting is perhaps best known for the $100 versus $120 experiment. Participants in this experiment were offered a choice between receiving $100 today versus $120 in a week. Most people would choose the $100 immediately. Then they were offered the choice between $100 in a year versus $120 in a year and a week. From a rational perspective, these questions are identical — yet when adding the ‘year’, most people chose to take the $120 option.
Climate change.
This one’s a bit opinionated perhaps, but is it really? It is now pretty clear that climate change is a massive threat to humanity — there, I said it. Yet humans are reticent to act. Compare that to how most governments invested in dealing with the threat of covid when it was having clear immediate impacts. The immediate threat gets the attention, the distant one can be all too easily ignored.
Hyperbolic discounting is a core model in behavioural economics and has countless implications.
Use the following examples of connected and complementary models to weave hyperbolic discounting into your broader latticework of mental models. Alternatively, discover your own connections by exploring the category list above.
Connected models:
- Fast and slow thinking: the model that explains the broader backdrop of heuristics and behavioural economics.
- Loss aversion: another fundamental and intrinsically linked model
Complementary models:
- Habit loop: particularly B.J. Foggs idea of ‘tiny habits’ or immediate rewards.
- Systems versus goals: in establishing the routine over relying on a distant goal.
- Divide and conquer: in respect to breaking down large projects.
- Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion: particularly in terms of freemium and quick value in relation to reciprocity.
Hyperbolic discounting was built on the work of Richard Hernstein who developed a ‘matching law’ before coining the term ‘hyperbolic discounting’ in a 1961 paper.
Oops, That’s Members’ Only!
Fortunately, it only costs US$5/month to Join ModelThinkers and access everything so that you can rapidly discover, learn, and apply the world’s most powerful ideas.
ModelThinkers membership at a glance:
“Yeah, we hate pop ups too. But we wanted to let you know that, with ModelThinkers, we’re making it easier for you to adapt, innovate and create value. We hope you’ll join us and the growing community of ModelThinkers today.”